A Randomized Study Comparing the Effect of Loratadine Added to Montelukast with Montelukast, Loratadine, and Beclomethasone Monotherapies in Patients with Chronic Asthma
Authors:
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Asthma
- Vol. 46 (5) , 465-469
Abstract
Background. Loratadine added to montelukast has been suggested to improve endpoints of asthma. Objective. This study investigated the additive effects of concomitant montelukast and loratadine when compared with montelukast, loratadine, and inhaled beclomethasone monotherapies in asthma. Methods. Patients (N = 406) were 15 to 65 years of age with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)-predicted of 50% to 85%, FEV1 reversibility ≥ 15%, and a minimal level of daytime symptoms and β -agonist use. This three-part 2X2 crossover-study consisted of two double-blind 6-week treatment periods where patients were administered once daily oral montelukast 10 mg, loratadine 10 mg, montelukast 10 mg + loratadine 10 mg, or twice daily inhaled beclomethasone 200 μ g. A subsequent 48-week extension study compared montelukast+loratadine with beclomethasone. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in FEV1. Results. Over 6 weeks of double-blind treatment, significant improvements (p < 0.05) in the primary endpoint of FEV1 were seen for montelukast+loratadine versus loratadine (least-square mean percentage-point difference of 5.8%), beclomethasone versus montelukast+loratadine (2.35%), montelukast versus loratadine (5.94%), and beclomethasone versus montelukast (4.65%); a numerical improvement (p = 0.054) was seen for montelukast+loratadine versus montelukast (1.60%). Significant improvements for montelukast+loratadine versus montelukast were seen in some secondary endpoints (evening peak expiratory flow, nocturnal asthma symptom score, nocturnal awakenings, and asthma-specific quality of life) but not others. Significant improvements in most endpoints except daytime asthma symptoms score were seen for montelukast+loratadine versus loratadine. In the extension study, both montelukast+loratadine and beclomethasone improved several endpoints. All treatments were generally comparable in the percentage of patients with clinical and laboratory adverse experiences. Conclusion. In this study, the addition of loratadine to montelukast produced a small numerical, but not statistically significant, improvement in FEV1 and, in general, no consistent improvement in other asthma endpoints. No improvement of montelukast+loratadine versus beclomethasone was seen in any endpoint.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Levocetirizine in persistent allergic rhinitis and asthma: effects on symptoms, quality of life and inflammatory parametersClinical & Experimental Allergy, 2006
- Comparison of cetirizine-pseudoephedrine and placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and concomitant mild-to-moderate asthma: randomized, double-blind studyAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2006
- How does exercise cause asthma attacks?Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2006
- Novel signal transduction modulators for the treatment of airway diseasesPharmacology & Therapeutics, 2006
- Are There Any Realistic Chances to Develop New Drugs for Asthma?Drug News & Perspectives, 2006
- Effect of combined montelukast and desloratadine on the early asthmatic response to inhaled allergenJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2005
- Advances in pediatric and adult asthmaJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2005
- Are antihistamines useful in managing asthma?Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2002
- Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials.Thorax, 1992
- Effect of a non‐sedative antihistaminic (loratadine) in moderate asthmaAllergy, 1989