A Sequent Calculus Perspective on Base-Extension Semantics
Preprint
Abstract
We define base-extension semantics (Bes) using atomic systems based on sequent calculus rather than natural deduction. While traditional Bes aligns naturally with intuitionistic logic due to its constructive foundations, we show that sequent calculi with multiple conclusions yield a Bes framework more suited to classical semantics. The harmony in classical sequents leads to straightforward semantic clauses derived solely from right introduction rules. This framework enables a Sandqvist-style completeness proof that extracts a sequent calculus proof from any valid semantic consequence. Moreover, we show that the inclusion or omission of atomic cut rules meaningfully affects the semantics, yet completeness holds in both cases.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- An ecumenical view of proof-theoretic semanticsSynthese, 2025
- Proof-Theoretic Semantics for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Linear Logic2023
- From axioms to synthetic inference rules via focusingAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic, 2022
- On Dummett’s verificationist justification procedureSynthese, 2015
- Base-extension semantics for intuitionistic sentential logicLogic Journal of the IGPL, 2015
- Failure of Completeness in Proof-Theoretic SemanticsJournal of Philosophical Logic, 2014
- On an inferential semantics for classical logicLogic Journal of the IGPL, 2013
- Classical logic without bivalenceAnalysis, 2009
- Meaning Approached Via ProofsSynthese, 2006
- Natural Deduction and Weak Normalization for Full Linear LogicLogic Journal of the IGPL, 2004