Azetukalner, a Novel KV7 Potassium Channel Opener, in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 May 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Network Open
- Vol. 8 (5) , e2514278
Abstract
Importance: Available antidepressants provide inadequate therapeutic responses in many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), highlighting a substantial unmet need.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of azetukalner, a novel, potent KV7 potassium channel opener, in participants with MDD.Design, Setting, and Participants: X-NOVA was a multicenter, proof-of-concept, phase 2, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial that evaluated azetukalner in participants (adults aged ≥18 to ≤65 years) with moderate to severe MDD in a current depressive episode. Participants were enrolled between April 2022 and October 2023, and data analysis occurred from January 2023 to January 2024.Intervention: Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to 10 mg of azetukalner, 20 mg of azetukalner, or placebo orally once daily with food for 6 weeks, with a 4-week follow-up. Concomitant antidepressant medications were not permitted.Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score at week 6. Secondary end points included change from baseline at week 6 in the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Exploratory end points included change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 17-Item (HAM-D17) score and change in MADRS at week 1. Frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded.Results: Altogether, 168 participants were randomized (56 to placebo, 56 to 10 mg of azetukalner, and 56 to 20 mg of azetukalner); mean (SD) age was 47.2 (13.6) years, and 111 participants (66.5%) were female. The modified intent-to-treat and safety populations consisted of 164 and 167 participants, respectively. The mean (SE) reduction in MADRS scores from baseline to week 6 was –13.90 (1.41) points with placebo, –15.61 (1.34) points with 10 mg of azetukalner, and –16.94 (1.45) points with 20 mg of azetukalner; the mean (SE) reduction with 20 mg of azetukalner vs placebo was clinically meaningful but not statistically significant (–3.04 points; 95% CI, –7.04 to 0.96 points; P = .14) at week 6, while significant at week 1 (–2.66 points; 95% CI, –5.30 to –0.03 points; P = .047). The mean (SE) reduction in HAM-D17 from baseline to week 6 was significantly greater with 20 mg of azetukalner vs placebo (–13.3 [1.1] vs –10.2 [1.0] points; P = .04). The mean (SE) reduction in SHAPS scores from baseline to week 6 was significantly greater with 20 mg of azetukalner vs placebo (–7.77 [0.87] vs –5.30 [0.85] points; P = .046). Similar rates of discontinuation due to TEAEs were reported across groups.Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of azetukalner, preliminary findings supported its further clinical development for the treatment of MDD and anhedonia.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05376150Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Did STAR*D Teach Us? Results From a Large-Scale, Practical, Clinical Trial for Patients With DepressionPsychiatric Services, 2009
- Anhedonia in schizophrenia and major depression: state or trait?Annals of General Psychiatry, 2009
- Does the probability of receiving placebo influence clinical trial outcome? A meta-regression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials in MDDEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 2009
- The clinical relevance of changes in the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale using the minimum clinically important difference approachCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2008
- Acute and Longer-Term Outcomes in Depressed Outpatients Requiring One or Several Treatment Steps: A STAR*D ReportAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2006
- Evaluation of Outcomes With Citalopram for Depression Using Measurement-Based Care in STAR*D: Implications for Clinical PracticeAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2006
- Differentiating moderate and severe depression using the Montgomery–Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS)Journal of Affective Disorders, 2003
- Depression: the case for a monoamine deficiency.2000
- A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to ChangeThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1979
- A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSIONJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1960