Interprofessional communication in medical simulation: findings from a scoping review and implications for academic medicine
Open Access
- 26 March 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Education
- Vol. 22 (1) , 1-12
Abstract
Background: Interprofessional communication is fundamental to the delivery of healthcare and can be taught in medical school and other health professional schools through interprofessional education (IPE) activities. Simulation centers have become a predominant location for simulation IPE activities with infrastructure able to support high fidelity activities in a controlled environment. In this secondary analysis of a scoping review conducted on simulation-based IPE, we describe the characteristics of previously reported simulation IPE activities involving undergraduate medical students in a simulation center focused on interprofessional communication.Methods: Electronic searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and ERIC databases in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines were conducted to isolate relevant articles from 2016–2020. In total, 165 peer-reviewed articles met inclusion criteria and data extraction linked to four research questions was applied by one individual and the accuracy was confirmed by a second individual. A secondary analysis was performed to describe what existing approaches for simulation IPE in simulation center settings have been used to explicitly achieve interprofessional communication competencies in undergraduate medical education. A sub-dataset was developed from the original scoping review and identified 21 studies describing simulation IPE activities that took place in dedicated simulation centers, targeted the IPEC interprofessional communication domain, and involved undergraduate medical students.Results: Though diverse, the majority of simulation IPE activities described high-fidelity approaches involving standardized patients and utilized assessment tools with established validity evidence in IPE activities to measure learning outcomes. A minority of simulation IPE activities were described as hybrid and utilized more than one resource or equipment for the activity and only two were longitudinal in nature. Learning outcomes were focused predominantly on modification of attitudes/perceptions and few targeted higher levels of assessment.Conclusions: Educators charged with developing simulation IPE activities for medical students focused on interprofessional communication should incorporate assessment tools that have validity evidence from similar activities, target higher level learning outcomes, and leverage hybrid models to develop longitudinal simulation IPE activities. Though an ideal environment to achieve higher level learning outcomes, simulation centers are not required for meaningful simulation IPE activities.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agendaMedical Education, 2011
- Team Communication With Patient ActorsSimulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2011
- An Interprofessional Approach to Teaching Communication SkillsJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2011
- Students’ perceptions of interprofessional learning through facilitated online learning modulesMedical Teacher, 2010
- Medical competence: The interplay between individual ability and the health care environmentMedical Teacher, 2010
- Communication skills and error in the intensive care unitCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2007
- Promoting interprofessional educationNursing Outlook, 2007
- Decline in ICU adverse events, nosocomial infections and cost through a quality improvement initiative focusing on teamwork and culture changeQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2006
- A blueprint for interprofessional learningJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2005
- Low‐ to high‐fidelity simulation – a continuum of medical education?Medical Education, 2003