Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: A randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up*
Authors:
- Donna GoldsmithDGDonna Goldsmith
- Shige UchinoSUShige Uchino
- Rinaldo BellomoRBRinaldo Bellomo
- Simon KnightSKSimon Knight
- Siven SeevanayagamSSSiven Seevanayagam
- Danny BrazzaleDBDanny Brazzale
- Marcus McMahonMMMarcus McMahon
- Jon BuckmasterJBJon Buckmaster
- Graeme K. HartGHGraeme K. Hart
- Helen OpdamHOHelen Opdam
- Robert J. PierceRPRobert J. Pierce
- 1 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 34 (8) , 2145-2152
Abstract
To compare the safety, availability, and long-term sequelae of percutaneous vs. surgical tracheostomy. Prospective, randomized, controlled study. Combined medical/surgical intensive care unit in a tertiary referral hospital. Two hundred critically ill mechanically ventilated patients who required tracheostomy. Tracheostomy by either percutaneous tracheostomy or surgical tracheostomy performed in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome measure was the aggregate incidence of predefined moderate or severe complications. The secondary outcome measures were the incidence of each of the components of the primary outcome. Long-term follow-up included clinical assessment, flow volume loops, and bronchoscopy. Both groups were well matched for age, gender, admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, period of endotracheal intubation, reason for intubation, and admission diagnosis. There was no statistical difference between groups for the primary outcome. Bleeding requiring surgical intervention occurred in three percutaneous tracheostomy patients and in no surgical tracheostomy patient (p = .2). Postoperative infection (p = .044) and cosmetic sequelae (p = .08) were more common in surgical tracheostomy patients. There was a shorter delay from randomization to percutaneous tracheostomy vs. surgical tracheostomy (p = .006). Long-term follow-up revealed no complications in either group. Both percutaneous tracheostomies and surgical tracheostomies can be safely performed at the bedside by experienced, skilled practitioners.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new simple method for percutaneous tracheostomy: controlled rotating dilationIntensive Care Medicine, 2002
- A prospective, randomized study comparing percutaneous with surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patientsCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Bedside Tracheostomy in the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Open Surgical Tracheostomy With Endoscopically Guided Percutaneous Dilational TracheotomyThe Laryngoscope, 2001
- Percutaneous Versus Surgical TracheostomyAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomyActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1998
- A non-derivative, non-surgical tracheostomy: the translaryngeal methodIntensive Care Medicine, 1997
- Comparison of Percutaneous and Surgical TracheostomiesChest, 1996
- Comparative clinical trial of standard operative tracheostomy with percutaneous tracheostomyCritical Care Medicine, 1991
- Percutaneous tracheostomy—A new methodCritical Care Medicine, 1989
- Elective Percutaneous Dilatational TracheostomyChest, 1985