Comparison of outcomes of reinforced tension band wiring and precontoured plate and screw fixation in the management of Mayo type IIIB olecranon fractures
Open Access
- 25 April 2025
- journal article
- Published by The Korean Orthopaedic Trauma Association in Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma
- Vol. 38 (2) , 96-101
Abstract
Background: Mayo type IIIB olecranon fractures are characterized by significant displacement and comminution, presenting a challenge in selecting the appropriate fixation technique. This study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates of reinforced tension band wiring (TBW) and precontoured plate and screw fixation (PF) in the surgical treatment of Mayo type IIIB olecranon fractures.Methods: This retrospective review analyzed 24 patients diagnosed with Mayo type IIIB olecranon fractures, who were treated between 2005 and 2023. Of these, 11 patients underwent reinforced TBW, and 13 received precontoured PF. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Radiographic outcomes focused on fracture union. Operative times, complication rates, and reoperation rates were compared between the groups.Results: Both the reinforced TBW and PF groups achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes, with no significant between-group differences in DASH and MEPS scores (P>0.05). Radiographic union was achieved in all patients. The reinforced TBW group demonstrated a significantly shorter operative time than the PF group (93.6±7.4 min vs. 132.3±13.7 min; P<0.001). Complication rates were similar between the two groups (reinforced TBW, 38.4%; PF, 36.3%), but hardware-related irritation occurred more frequently in the reinforced TBW group. Reoperations were required in 15.8% of the reinforced TBW group due to hardware irritation, whereas no reoperations were necessary in the PF group.Conclusions: Reinforced TBW and PF are both effective surgical options for managing Mayo type IIIB olecranon fractures, yielding comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes. While reinforced TBW offers shorter operative times and lower costs, PF is associated with fewer hardware-related complications. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize treatment strategies for these complex fractures.Level of Evidence: Level III.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy and safety of tension band wire versus plate for Mayo II olecranon fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2022
- Cost Assessment of Plating Versus Tension Band Wiring Constructs for Treating Mayo Type 2A Olecranon FracturesThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2022
- Plate fixation and tension band wiring after isolated olecranon fracture comparison of outcome and complicationsJournal of Orthopaedics, 2020
- Intramedullary Cancellous Screw Fixation of Simple Olecranon FracturesStrategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, 2019
- Fractures of the proximal ulna: current concepts in surgical managementEFORT Open Reviews, 2019
- Classifications in Brief: Mayo Classification of Olecranon FracturesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2018
- Tension band wiring versus locking plate fixation for simple, two-part Mayo 2A olecranon fractures: a comparison of post-operative outcomes, complications, reoperations and economicsMUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2018
- Efficacy and safety of tension band wiring versus plate fixation in olecranon fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2016
- Suture Repair of Simple Transverse Olecranon Fractures and Chevron Olecranon OsteotomyTechniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery, 2016
- The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal ulnaInjury, 2012