Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb
Author:
Open Access
- 1 February 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Zoologist
- Vol. 29 (1) , 235-254
Abstract
SYNOPSIS. The evolution of the tetrapod limb is examined from two perspectives: structural and functional. Rosen et al. (1981) argued that lungfishes are the sister group of tetrapods, with limb characteristics comprising an important subset of their evidence. A re-analysis of the limb characters advocated by Rosen et al. does not support their contention, but instead suggests that rhipidistian fishes of the family Osteolepidae are the closest relatives of the tetrapods. In order to understand the probable selective pressures leading to evolution of the tetrapod limb, a functional analysis of the fins of antennariid anglerfishes was performed. Antennariids use their limb-like fins to traverse underwater substrates. The analysis reveals a large number of functional and morphological convergences between antennariid fins and tetrapod limbs. It is suggested that tetrapod limbs were evolved for underwater transport rather than for locomotion on dry land.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Morphogenetic Approach to the Origin and Basic Organization of the Tetrapod Limb1986
- Are lungfishes the sister group of tetrapods?Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1985
- Paedomorphosis and the evolution of the DipnoiPaleobiology, 1984
- Historical biology and the problem of designJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1982
- The Adaptive Significance of Tetrapod Gait SelectionAmerican Zoologist, 1980
- High-Speed Cinematographic Evidence for Ultrafast Feeding in Antennariid AnglerfishesScience, 1979
- THE BIOLOGY OF THE LOBE‐FINNED FISHESBiological Reviews, 1969
- The Mechanics of Amphibian LocomotionJournal of Experimental Biology, 1946
- ON THE ORIGIN OF THE TETRAPOD LIMBActa Zoologica, 1933
- XX. Description of the Lepidosiren annectens.Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 1840