Time, history and meaning-making in research on people's relations with renewable energy technologies (RETs) – A conceptual proposal
Authors:
- Sophia KüpersSKSophia Küpers
- Susana BatelSBSusana Batel
Open Access
- 10 January 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Energy Policy
- Vol. 173
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case studyJournal of Environmental Psychology, 2010
- Why we still don’t understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literatureEnergy Policy, 2010
- Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposalsJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2007
- NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversiesEnergy Policy, 2007
- Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperationEnergy Policy, 2007
- Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBYTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2006
- Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energyWind Energy, 2004
- Understanding carbon lock-inEnergy Policy, 2000
- Entanglement of Interests and Motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on Facility SitingUrban Studies, 1994
- Historical Sociology and TimeSociological Methods & Research, 1992