Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Clinical Interventions in Aging
- Vol. ume 3 (2) , 279-297
Abstract
Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis – optimizing efficacy in clinical practice Oliver Bock, Dieter FelsenbergCenter for Muscle and Bone Research, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclastic bone resorption. With their individually proven efficacy to significantly reduce the incidence of vertebral and/or non-vertebral fractures and with their overall beneficial safety profile, alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate are considered today a treatment of first choice in postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, treatment effects in an individual patient and cost-effectiveness in public health perspective are vitally dependent on the long-term patient adherence as well as on compliance and persistence. As compliance and persistence with daily oral bisphosphonates are shown to be suboptimal in many patients, leading to an increased fracture incidence in non-compliant patients, there is a need to improve overall adherence for bisphosphonate treatment in order to achieve maximum treatment effects. One option is to extend dosing intervals to weekly (alendronate, risedronate) or monthly (ibandronate) oral regimens. Less frequent oral regimens are generally preferred by majority of patients. Another alternative is intravenous, instead of oral application (ibandronate, zoledronate). Treatment acceptance could be further improved by IV bisphosphonates with their benefit of only quarterly, or even once-yearly, application. Treatment decisions should be based on anti-fracture efficacy data first. In addition, to ensure best possible patient adherence and maximum treatment benefits, physicians should consider individual patient conditions affecting compliance and persistence as well as patient preferences.Keywords: postmenopausal osteoporosis, bisphosphonates, fracture risk reduction, adherence, dosing frequencies, patient considerationsKeywords
This publication has 120 references indexed in Scilit:
- The association between compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy and fracture risk: A reviewBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2007
- Factors affecting long-term compliance of osteoporotic patients with bisphosphonate treatment and QOL assessment in actual practice: alendronate and risedronateJournal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 2007
- Safety Considerations with Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of OsteoporosisDrug Safety, 2007
- Effectiveness of bisphosphonates on nonvertebral and hip fractures in the first year of therapy: The risedronate and alendronate (REAL) cohort studyOsteoporosis International, 2006
- An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fracturesOsteoporosis International, 2006
- Treatment persistence with once-monthly ibandronate and patient support vs. once-weekly alendronate: results from the PERSIST study*International Journal Of Clinical Practice, 2006
- The molecular mechanism of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates as antiosteoporosis drugsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Preferences for medical collaboration: patient–physician congruence and patient outcomesPatient Education and Counseling, 2005
- Effects of Oral Ibandronate Administered Daily or Intermittently on Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal OsteoporosisJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2004
- Long-Term Treatment of Incadronate Disodium Accumulates Microdamage but Improves the Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture in Dog VertebraJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2003