Grading of direct laryngoscopy A survey of current practice

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Summary: One hundred and twenty anaesthetists (30 of each grade), from three separate regions, were interviewed as to how they recorded the appearance of laryngeal structures at direct laryngoscopy and about their knowledge of the commonly used numerical grading system. About two‐thirds of anaesthetists surveyed (69.2%) used the numerical grading system, but of these, over half could not identify a‘grade 2’laryngoscopic appearance correctly. Of anaesthetists who did not use the numerical method, over half could not correctly state the difference between a‘grade 2’and a‘grade 3’laryngoscopic appearance. Over 40% of anaesthetists stated incorrectly that the grading should be made on the initial view, even when laryngeal pressure had been needed. Junior anaesthetists were more likely to use the numerical method of recording. The results show that there is unacceptable uncertainty and inaccuracy in the use of the numerical grading system by users as well as non‐users, which makes the current routine clinical use of the numerical grading system unsatisfactory.

This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit: