Emergency Department Revisits for Patients with Kidney Stones in California
Authors:
- Charles D. ScalesCSCharles D. Scales
- Ninez A. PonceNPNinez A. Ponce
- Mark S. LitwinMLMark S. Litwin
- The Niddk Urologic Diseases In America ProjectTPThe Niddk Urologic Diseases In America Project
Open Access
- 16 March 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 22 (4) , 468-474
Abstract
Objectives: Kidney stones affect nearly one in 11 persons in the United States, and among those experiencing symptoms, emergency care is common. In this population, little is known about the incidence of and factors associated with repeat emergency department (ED) visits. The objective was to identify associations between potentially mutable factors and the risk of an ED revisit for patients with kidney stones in a large, all‐payer cohort.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients in California initially treated and released from EDs for kidney stones between February 2008 and November 2009. A multivariable regression model was created to identify associations between patient‐level characteristics, area health care resources, processes of care, and the risk of repeat ED visits. The primary outcome was a second ED visit within 30 days of the initial discharge from emergent care.Results: Among 128,564 patients discharged from emergent care, 13,684 (11%) had at least one additional emergent visit for treatment of their kidney stone. In these patients, nearly one in three required hospitalization or an urgent temporizing procedure at the second visit. On multivariable analysis, the risk of an ED revisit was associated with insurance status (e.g., Medicaid vs. private insurance; odds ratio [OR] = 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.43 to 1.61; p < 0.001). Greater access to urologic care was associated with lower odds of an ED revisit (highest quartile OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.97; p < 0.01 vs. lowest quartile). In exploratory models, performance of a complete blood count was associated with a decreased odds of revisit (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.97; p = 0.02).Conclusions: Repeat high‐acuity care affects one in nine patients discharged from initial emergent evaluations for kidney stones. Access to urologic care and processes of care are associated with lower risk of repeat emergent encounters. Efforts are indicated to identify preventable causes of ED revisits for kidney stone patients and design interventions to reduce the risk of high‐cost, high‐acuity, repeat care.Keywords
Funding Information
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (HHSN276201200016C)
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Effectiveness of Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopy for Treating Patients With Kidney StonesJAMA Surgery, 2014
- Practice patterns in the emergency care of kidney stone patients: an analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS).2012
- Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United StatesEuropean Urology, 2012
- Eliminating Waste in US Health CareJAMA, 2012
- Practice Variation in the Surgical Management of Urinary LithiasisJournal of Urology, 2011
- Urologist Density and County-Level Urologic Cancer MortalityJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Geographic Distribution of Urologists Throughout the United States Using a County Level ApproachJournal of Urology, 2009
- 2007 Guideline for the Management of Ureteral CalculiJournal of Urology, 2007
- Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2006
- Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?Kidney International, 2005