Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance between local adaptation and inbreeding depression
- 4 August 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 278 (1702) , 2-8
Abstract
When previously isolated populations meet and mix, the resulting admixed population can benefit from several genetic advantages, including increased genetic variation, the creation of novel genotypes and the masking of deleterious mutations. These admixture benefits are thought to play an important role in biological invasions. In contrast, populations in their native range often remain differentiated and frequently suffer from inbreeding depression owing to isolation. While the advantages of admixture are evident for introduced populations that experienced recent bottlenecks or that face novel selection pressures, it is less obvious why native range populations do not similarly benefit from admixture. Here we argue that a temporary loss of local adaptation in recent invaders fundamentally alters the fitness consequences of admixture. In native populations, selection against dilution of the locally adapted gene pool inhibits unconstrained admixture and reinforces population isolation, with some level of inbreeding depression as an expected consequence. We show that admixture is selected against despite significant inbreeding depression because the benefits of local adaptation are greater than the cost of inbreeding. In contrast, introduced populations that have not yet established a pattern of local adaptation can freely reap the benefits of admixture. There can be strong selection for admixture because it instantly lifts the inbreeding depression that had built up in isolated parental populations. Recent work in Silene suggests that reduced inbreeding depression associated with post-introduction admixture may contribute to enhanced fitness of invasive populations. We hypothesize that in locally adapted populations, the benefits of local adaptation are balanced against an inbreeding cost that could develop in part owing to the isolating effect of local adaptation itself. The inbreeding cost can be revealed in admixing populations during recent invasions.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Meta-Analysis of Local Adaptation in PlantsPLOS ONE, 2008
- Evidence for multiple sources of invasion and intraspecific hybridization inBrachypodium sylvaticum(Hudson) Beauv. in North AmericaMolecular Ecology, 2008
- Admixture determines genetic diversity and population differentiation in the biological invasion of a lizard speciesBiology Letters, 2008
- Molecular and Quantitative Genetic Differentiation in European Populations of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae)Annals of Botany, 2007
- Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grassProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Does intraspecific hybridization contribute to the evolution of invasiveness?: an experimental testBiological Invasions, 2006
- Heterosis, the catapult effect and establishment success of a colonizing birdBiology Letters, 2006
- Population differentiation and hybrid success inCampanula americana: geography and genome sizeJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 2005
- Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A HypothesisJournal of Ecology, 1995
- Corresponding patterns of geographic variation among populations ofSilene latifolia (=S. alba =S. pratensis) (Caryophyllaceae)Plant Systematics and Evolution, 1984