My, how you've grown: A practical guide to modeling size transitions for integral projection model (IPM) applications
Abstract
Integral projection models (IPMs) are widely used for studying continuously size‐structured populations. IPMs require a growth sub‐model that describes the probability of future size conditional on current size and any covariates. Most IPM studies assume that this distribution is Gaussian, despite calls for non‐Gaussian models that accommodate skewness and excess kurtosis. We provide a general workflow for accommodating non‐Gaussian growth patterns while retaining important covariates and random effects. Our approach emphasizes visual diagnostics from pilot Gaussian models and quantile‐based metrics of skewness and kurtosis that guide selection of a non‐Gaussian alternative, if necessary. Across six case studies, skewness and excess kurtosis were common features of growth data, and non‐Gaussian models consistently generated simulated data that were more consistent with real data than pilot Gaussian models. However, effects of “improved” growth modeling on IPM results were moderate to weak and differed in direction or magnitude between different outputs from the same model. Using tools not available when IPMs were first developed, it is now possible to fit non‐Gaussian models to growth data without sacrificing ecological complexity. Doing so, as guided by careful interrogation of the data, will result in models that better represent the populations for which they are intended.Keywords
Funding Information
- Division of Environmental Biology (1655499)
- Division of Environmental Biology (1748133)
- Division of Environmental Biology (1754468)
- Division of Environmental Biology (1933497)
- Division of Environmental Biology (2208857)
- Division of Environmental Biology (2225027)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Climate change weakens the impact of disturbance interval on the growth rate of natural populations of Venus flytrapEcological Monographs, 2022
- A critical comparison of integral projection and matrix projection models for demographic analysis: CommentEcology, 2021
- A critical comparison of integral projection and matrix projection models for demographic analysisEcological Monographs, 2021
- Effects of size‐ and sex‐selective harvesting: An integral projection model approachEcology and Evolution, 2019
- A guide to Bayesian model checking for ecologistsEcological Monographs, 2018
- The effect of demographic correlations on the stochastic population dynamics of perennial plantsEcological Monographs, 2016
- Data-driven Modelling of Structured Populations2016
- Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models2013
- Comparative demography of an epiphytic lichen: support for general life history patterns and solutions to common problems in demographic parameter estimationOecologia, 2012
- Targeted Learning2011