The Importance of Follow-Up Visits for Children at Risk of Developmental Delay—A Review

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Structured follow-up visits should be accessible for children at risk for developmental delay. Follow-up visits should include a serial neuromotor assessment in the first two years of life (e.g., 3–6, 12, 24 months corrected age), which are repeated during the transition to school. The diagnosis of neuromotor development may be prognostic for important skills later in life. The early diagnosis of a child’s general movements can be helpful in planning appropriately for proper treatment and intervention. These diagnostic assessments should be conducted by qualified healthcare professionals. The evaluation of neuromotor developmental health is specified in the national guidelines and funded by either a national government or public or private healthcare insurance and based on standardized assessment scales. The aim of this study is to show what elements of follow-up visits are recommended. Objectives: The group of patients for whom the structured follow-up systems are intended were children born very preterm (<32 weeks gestation) or full-term born children with severe neonatal complications. Material and methods: The methods for monitoring neurodevelopment include the following: The General Movements Assessment (GMA), the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3), the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-4), and the Parent Report of Children’s Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R). Results: The results of follow-up visits should be registered. Conclusions: The benefits of follow-up neuromotor development assessments can be observed at school age and even in adulthood.

This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit: