Metal-backed patella: a reasonable alternative in a bone-preserving approach in revision TKA
Open Access
- 13 August 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
- p. 1-8
Abstract
Introduction: Patellar management during revision TKA (rTKA) remains challenging. Metal-backed patella (MBP) with highly porous titanium coating applied by 3D printing may provide improved fixation in TKA, especially in patients with limited bone stock. The primary aim of this study was to assess implant survivorship among patients who received a new-generation MBP during revision TKA. Secondary aims were to assess (1) healthcare utilization, and (2) preoperative and 1-year PROMs. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who received a MBP during rTKA from 2017 to 2022. In total, 31 patients achieved an average follow-up of 3.0 years (SD 1.5 years). Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain, KOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), KOOS Joint Replacement (JR) and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS) were obtained preoperatively and at 1-year. Most patients had prior ipsilateral prosthetic joint infection (PJI; n = 22, 71%). Results: MBP implant survivorship was 96.8%. No patients had evidence of patellar component aseptic loosening. The average patellar thickness was 11.8 mm (SD 2.3 mm). After rTKA, most patients were discharged home following surgery ( n = 24, 77.4%). There were 5 patients (16.1%) readmitted within 90-days, and no deaths within 1-year. Significant improvement was found in KOOS Pain ( p < 0.001), and KOOS JR ( p = 0.005), but not KOOS PS ( p = 0.080) or VR-12 MCS ( p = 0.279). Conclusions: Titanium 3D-printed MBP resulted in excellent implant survivorship with major improvements in pain and overall joint health. Thus, MBP appears to be a viable patellar component option in revision TKA.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cementless Metal-Backed Patellar Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Average 10-Year Follow-UpThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2023
- Re-revision Knee Arthroplasty in a Tertiary Center: Infection and Multiple Previous Surgeries Were Associated With Poor Early Clinical and Functional OutcomesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2023
- Neural network models accurately predict discharge disposition after revision total knee arthroplasty?Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021
- Outcomes of Newer Generation Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Beaded Periapatite-Coated vs Highly Porous Titanium-Coated ImplantsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2017
- Are Bundled Payments a Viable Reimbursement Model for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2016
- Clinical Outcomes and Costs Within 90 Days of Primary or Revision Total Joint ArthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2016
- Loss of Cement-bone Interlock in Retrieved Tibial Components from Total Knee ArthroplastiesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2013
- Cementless Revision TKA with Bone Grafting of Osseous Defects Restores Bone Stock with a Low Revision Rate at 4 to 10 yearsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Management of the Deficient Patella in Revision Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- Failure of metal-backed patellar components after total knee arthroplastyThe Knee, 1995