Idiographic and nomothetic approaches to heterogeneity are complementary: Response to comments on “Evaluating the influences of temperature, primary production, and evolutionary history on bivalve growth rates”
Authors:
- James SaulsburyJSJames Saulsbury
- David K. MossDMDavid K. Moss
- Linda C. IvanyLILinda C. Ivany
- Michał KowalewskiMKMichał Kowalewski
- David R. LindbergDLDavid R. Lindberg
- James F. GilloolyJGJames F. Gillooly
- Noel A. HeimNHNoel A. Heim
- Craig R. McClainCMCraig R. McClain
- Jonathan L. PayneJPJonathan L. Payne
- Peter D. RoopnarinePRPeter D. Roopnarine
- Bernd R. SchöneBSBernd R. Schöne
- David GoodwinDGDavid Goodwin
- 3 June 2020
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Paleobiology
- Vol. 46 (2) , 275-277
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bivalve growth and the invisible hand of heterogeneityPaleobiology, 2020
- Evaluating the influences of temperature, primary production, and evolutionary history on bivalve growth ratesPaleobiology, 2019
- A macroevolutionary perspective on species range limitsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2009
- The Relation of Energy Metabolism and Body Weight in Bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia)Biology Bulletin, 2003