Higher order risk attitudes and prevention under different timings of loss
Authors:
- 11 August 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Experimental Economics
- Vol. 22 (1) , 197-215
Abstract
This paper provides experimental evidence of the role of higher order risk attitudes—especially prudence—in prevention behavior. Prudence, under an expected utility framework, increases (decreases) self-protection effort compared to the risk neutral level when the risk of losing part of an income exists in a future (the same) period. Motivated by these predictions that give the exact test on prudence, an experiment was designed where subjects go through higher order risk attitude elicitation and make a self-protection decision. In contrast to the expected utility theory, the observed efforts are less than the risk neutral level, regardless of the timing of loss. This violation of expected utility predictions can be explained by probability weighting.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17K13701, 15H05728)
- Keihanshin Consortium for Fostering the Next Generation of Global Leaders in Research
- John-Mung Overseas Program
- Murata Science and Education Foundation
- BK21Plus Program of the Ministry of Education and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-21B20130000013)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of award uncertainty on settlement negotiationsExperimental Economics, 2017
- Joint measurement of risk aversion, prudence, and temperanceJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2014
- Consistency of Higher Order Risk PreferencesEconometrica, 2014
- Prevention and Precaution2013
- Testing for Prudence and Skewness SeekingManagement Science, 2011
- Exploring Higher Order Risk EffectsReview of Economic Studies, 2010
- Chapter 113 Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence2008
- z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experimentsExperimental Economics, 2007
- Putting Risk in Its Proper PlaceAmerican Economic Review, 2006
- The impact of prudence on optimal preventionEconomic Theory, 2005