Overclaiming as a measure of faking
Authors:
- Mark N. BingMBMark N. Bing
- Don KluemperDKDon Kluemper
- H. Kristl DavisonHDH. Kristl Davison
- Shannon TaylorSTShannon Taylor
- Milorad NovicevicMNMilorad Novicevic
- 1 September 2011
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Vol. 116 (1) , 148-162
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Magnitude and Extent of Cheating and Response Distortion Effects on Unproctored Internet‐Based Tests of Cognitive Ability and PersonalityInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2010
- The Usefulness of Unit Weights in Creating Composite ScoresOrganizational Research Methods, 2007
- Integrating Implicit and Explicit Social Cognitions for Enhanced Personality AssessmentOrganizational Research Methods, 2007
- Incremental Validity of the Frame-of-Reference Effect in Personality Scale Scores: A Replication and Extension.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004
- Make my memory: How advertising can change our memories of the pastPsychology & Marketing, 2001
- Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996
- CORRECTING THE 16PF FOR FAKING: EFFECTS ON CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDITY AND INDIVIDUAL HIRING DECISIONSPersonnel Psychology, 1994
- Social desirability scales as moderator and suppressor variablesEuropean Journal of Personality, 1992
- The theory of planned behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- Inflation bias in self-assessment examinations: Implications for valid employee selection.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984