Who Defines the Margin? Dermatologist-Led Dermoscopy versus Plastic Surgeon–Led Clinical Assessment in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer
- 30 September 2026
- journal article
- Published by Ankara University in Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası
- Vol. 79 (3) , 383-391
Abstract
Objectives: To compare preoperative diagnostic concordance and histopathological margin outcomes between two pathways for clinically suspected nonmelanoma skin cancer: assessment and margin marking by dermatologists using clinical examination and dermoscopy versus assessment and marking by plastic surgeons using clinical examination and guideline-based risk stratification. All excisions were performed by the same plastic surgery team.Materials and Methods: This single-center, nonrandomized, prospective cohort study included patients presenting independently to Dermatology or to Plastic Surgery from December 2023 through December 2024 for primary excision of clinically suspicious lesions. After exclusions, 184 patients were analyzed: 100 in the dermatology pathway and 84 in the plastic surgery pathway. Comparisons used the Mann–Whitney U, chi-square, or Fisher exact test. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted margin positivity for age, tumor type, and anatomical site.Results: Diagnostic concordance was higher in dermatology pathway (63/70, 90.0%) than in plastic surgery pathway (41/60, 68.3%; risk difference 21.7 percentage points, 95% CI 8.0–35.4; OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.61–10.80; p=0.004). Positive margins occurred in 11/100 (11.0%) and 11/84 (13.1%), respectively (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.34–2.00; p=0.820), with no association after adjustment (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.34–2.16; p=0.747). The nearest lateral margin was wider in dermatology pathway (median 3.20 vs. 2.70 mm; p=0.027), but the difference became non-significant after excluding involved margins (p=0.053). Deep margins and tumor thickness were similar.Conclusion: Dermatologist-led preoperative assessment incorporating dermoscopy was associated with greater diagnostic concordance and in the primary analysis, wider lateral histopathological margins but not with a lower positive-margin rate. Because all excisions were performed by one surgical team, specialist preoperative assessment contributes principally to lesion characterization rather than to surgical clearance.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incomplete surgical excision of keratinocyte skin cancers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis*British Journal of Dermatology, 2020
- Dermoscopic Findings in the Presurgical Evaluation of Basal Cell Carcinoma. A Prospective StudyDermatologic Surgery, 2020
- British Association of Dermatologists ( BAD ) National Audit on Non‐Melanoma Skin Cancer Excision 2016 in collaboration with the Royal College of PathologistsClinical and Experimental Dermatology, 2019
- The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2019
- Basal cell carcinomaJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2019
- Guidelines of care for the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomaJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018
- Usefulness of margin detection by digital dermoscopy in the traditional surgical excision of basal cell carcinomas of the head and neck including infiltrative/morpheaform typeThe Journal of Dermatology, 2011
- Effect of tissue shrinkage on histological tumour-free margin after excision of basal cell carcinomaBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2009
- Shrinkage of skin excision specimens: formalin fixation is not the culpritBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2009
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesThe Lancet, 2007