A Transfer Learning-Based Framework for Classifying Lymph Node Metastasis in Prostate Cancer Patients
Open Access
- 15 October 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 12 (10) , 2345
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common new cancer diagnosis in the United States. It is usually slow-growing, and when it is low-grade and confined to the prostate gland, it can be treated either conservatively (through active surveillance) or with surgery. However, if the cancer has spread beyond the prostate, such as to the lymph nodes, then that indicates a more aggressive cancer, and surgery may not be adequate. Methods: The challenge is that it is often difficult for radiologists reading prostate-specific imaging such as magnetic resonance images (MRIs) to differentiate malignant lymph nodes from non-malignant ones. An emerging field is the development of artificial intelligence (AI) models, including machine learning and deep learning, for medical imaging to assist in diagnostic tasks. Earlier research focused on implementing texture algorithms to extract imaging features used in classification models. More recently, researchers began studying the use of deep learning for both stand-alone feature extraction and end-to-end classification tasks. In order to tackle the challenges inherent in small datasets, this study was designed as a scalable hybrid framework utilizing pre-trained ResNet-18, a deep learning model, to extract features that were subsequently fed into a machine learning classifier to automatically identify malignant lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. For comparison, two texture algorithms were implemented, namely the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and Gabor. Results: Using an institutional prostate lymph node dataset (42 positives, 84 negatives), the proposed framework achieved an accuracy of 76.19%, a sensitivity of 79.76%, and a specificity of 69.05%. Using GLCM features, the classification achieved an accuracy of 61.90%, a sensitivity of 74.07%, and a specificity of 42.86%. Using Gabor features, the classification achieved an accuracy of 65.08%, a sensitivity of 73.47%, and a specificity of 52.50%. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that a hybrid approach, i.e., using a pre-trainined deep learning model for feature extraction, followed by a machine learning classifier, is a viable solution. This hybrid approach is especially useful in medical-imaging-based applications with small datasets.Keywords
Funding Information
- Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of different lymph node staging schemes in prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastasisInternational Urology and Nephrology, 2019
- Application of deep learning to the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis from thyroid cancer with CTEuropean Radiology, 2019
- Differentiation of true-progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma treated with radiation therapy and concomitant temozolomide by GLCM texture analysis of conventional MRIClinical Imaging, 2015
- Texture Feature Analysis for Computer-Aided Diagnosis on Pulmonary NodulesJournal of Digital Imaging, 2014
- Multimodal wavelet embedding representation for data combination (MaWERiC): integrating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prostate cancer detectionNMR in Biomedicine, 2011
- Fast-recovery fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging: a free-breathing alternative to fast spin-echo in the pediatric abdomenPediatric Radiology, 2008
- Evaluation of focal liver lesions: fast-recovery fast spin echo T2-weighted MR imagingClinical Imaging, 2006
- Fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted MRI of the liver: Comparison of respiratory‐triggered fast spin‐echo, breath‐hold single‐shot fast spin‐echo, and breath‐hold fast‐recovery fast spin‐echo sequencesJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2001
- T2‐weighted MRI of the female pelvis: Comparison of breath‐hold fast‐recovery fast spin‐echo and nonbreath‐hold fast spin‐echo sequencesJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2001
- Phased array breath‐hold versus non‐breath‐hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: A prospective comparative studyJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1997