Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist or Bolus Insulin With Optimized Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes
- 10 September 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 37 (10) , 2763-2773
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mealtime insulin is commonly added to manage hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes when basal insulin is insufficient. However, this complex regimen is associated with weight gain and hypoglycemia. This study compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide twice daily or mealtime insulin lispro in patients inadequately controlled by insulin glargine and metformin despite up-titration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this 30-week, open-label, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial with 12 weeks prior insulin optimization, 627 patients with insufficient postoptimization glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were randomized to exenatide (10–20 µg/day) or thrice-daily mealtime lispro titrated to premeal glucose of 5.6–6.0 mmol/L, both added to insulin glargine (mean 61 units/day at randomization) and metformin (mean 2,000 mg/day). RESULTS Randomization HbA1c and fasting glucose (FG) were 8.3% (67 mmol/mol) and 7.1 mmol/L for exenatide and 8.2% (66 mmol/mol) and 7.1 mmol/L for lispro. At 30 weeks postrandomization, mean HbA1c changes were noninferior for exenatide compared with lispro (–1.13 and –1.10%, respectively); treatment differences were –0.04 (95% CI –0.18, 0.11) in per-protocol (n = 510) and –0.03 (95% CI –0.16, 0.11) in intent-to-treat (n = 627) populations. FG was lower with exenatide than lispro (6.5 vs. 7.2 mmol/L; P = 0.002). Weight decreased with exenatide and increased with lispro (−2.5 vs. +2.1 kg; P < 0.001). More patients reported treatment satisfaction and better quality of life with exenatide than lispro, although a larger proportion of patients with exenatide experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. Exenatide resulted in fewer nonnocturnal hypoglycemic episodes but more gastrointestinal adverse events than lispro. CONCLUSIONS Adding exenatide to titrated glargine with metformin resulted in similar glycemic control as adding lispro and was well tolerated. These findings support exenatide as a noninsulin addition for patients failing basal insulin.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combination therapy with GLP ‐1 receptor agonists and basal insulin: a systematic review of the literatureDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2012
- Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of the once‐daily GLP ‐1 receptor agonist lixisenatide in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on basal insulin with or without a sulfonylurea ( GetGoal ‐L‐Asia)Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2012
- Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Patient-Centered ApproachDiabetes Care, 2012
- Patient‐reported outcomes in trials of incretin‐based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitusDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2012
- Clinical relevance of anti‐exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross‐reactivity with long‐term treatmentDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2012
- Intensification of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An algorithm for basal-bolus therapyAnnals of Medicine, 2011
- Type 2 diabetes increases and metformin reduces total, colorectal, liver and pancreatic cancer incidences in Taiwanese: a representative population prospective cohort study of 800,000 individualsBMC Cancer, 2011
- Liraglutide versus sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycaemic control with metformin: a 26-week, randomised, parallel-group, open-label trialThe Lancet, 2010
- Three-Year Efficacy of Complex Insulin Regimens in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority studyThe Lancet, 2008