Metal Substrate-Dependent Tribological Performance of Environmentally Acceptable Ester–PAO Lubricant Blends
Open Access
- 8 July 2026
- journal article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Langmuir
- Vol. 42 (28) , 20415-20430
Abstract
Environmentally acceptable lubricants (EALs) are increasingly required in high-risk oil-to-sea interfaces, yet their boundary lubrication performance remains difficult to predict because it depends strongly on both lubricant chemistry and metal substrate reactivity. In this work, we compare the tribological response of stainless steel (AISI 316L) and bearing steel (AISI 52100) lubricated with a low-viscosity polyalphaolefin (PAO4), a polar pentaerythritol polyol ester (PE), and their 1:1 blended base oil, formulated with an environmentally acceptable ionic liquid, tributyl(ethyl)phosphonium diethyl phosphate (PEP), and with ZDDP as a benchmark additive. Ball-on-disc tests under identical boundary lubrication conditions show systematically lower friction and wear on bearing steel than on stainless steel, evidencing a strong substrate dependence. On stainless steel, a Cr-rich passive film limits additive-driven tribochemistry, and wear is therefore governed by base-oil polarity and additive-base lubricant competition for surface sites, which promotes abrasion when polarity increases. In contrast, the Fe-dominated chemistry of bearing steel enables tribochemical film formation, yielding lower wear across formulations. PEP delivers the most robust antiwear response, including cases of no measurable wear, and its performance is controlled by both adsorption and dispersion state: in PAO4, PEP forms an emulsion that deposits a thick viscoelastic layer suppressing wear but increasing friction, whereas in the base oil blend and PE, reduced emulsion stability and stronger surface competition shift the response toward phosphate-rich tribofilms and abrasive contributions. QCM-D reveals stronger/less reversible adsorption for PEP than for ZDDP, while ToF-SIMS confirms phosphorus-rich films as central to PEP protection and mixed P/S chemistry for ZDDP on Fe-reactive surfaces. These findings underline that the EAL formulation must be codesigned with substrate chemistry and base lubricant polarity to ensure reliable boundary performance.Keywords
Funding Information
- Norges Forskningsråd (302730)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tungsten-Based Polyoxometalate-Ionic Liquid as Lubricant Additive for Low-Viscosity PAO: Effect of Steel Composition and Microstructure on the Boundary Lubricating PerformanceTribology Letters, 2025
- Toward Cost-Effective Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants: Influence of Synthetic Ester and Low-Viscosity Polyalphaolefin Blend Type on Additive PerformanceTribology Letters, 2025
- Trimethylolpropane trioleate as eco-friendly lubricant additiveEngineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 2022
- The Influence of Steel Composition on the Formation and Effectiveness of Anti-wear Films in Tribological ContactsTribology Letters, 2021
- Enhanced Lubrication Ability of Polyalphaolefin and Polypropylene Glycol by COOH-Functionalized Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes as an AdditiveJournal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2021
- Ethoxylated Amine Friction Modifiers and ZDDPTribology Letters, 2019
- Film Thickness and Friction of ZDDP TribofilmsTribology Letters, 2019
- Tribochemistry and Morphology of P-Based Antiwear Films2018
- Friction performance of MoDTP and ester‐containing lubricants between CKS piston ring and cast iron cylinder linerLubrication Science, 2017
- Tribological behavior as lubricant additive and physiochemical characterization of Jatropha oil blendsFriction, 2015