Is Neoclassical Economics still Entrepreneurless?
Abstract
Summary: The paper reviews and evaluates some recent contributions on modeling entrepreneurship within a neoclassical framework, analyzing how, and to what extent, the fundamental ingredients suggested in the social science literature were captured. It is shown how these approaches are important in stressing the main elements of a complex picture, without being able to fully describe it. Each modeling attempt focuses only on one specific feature of entrepreneurship, and the entrepreneurial function, broadly perceived, eludes analytical tractability. As a consequence, the models can be useful in analyzing the effect of entrepreneurial behavior at an aggregate level, but not at explaining individual choices. From these observations, it is highlighted how a simplistic interpretation of the existing mainstream approaches incorporating entrepreneurship runs the risk of leading to distortionary policy interventions.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Low Returns in R&D due to the Lack of Entrepreneurial SkillsThe Economic Journal, 2002
- Knightian decision theory. Part IDecisions in Economics and Finance, 2002
- Entrepreneurship, Economic Risks, and Risk Insurance in the Welfare State: Results with OECD Data 1978±93German Economic Review, 2001
- Financial Capital, Human Capital, and the Transition to Self‐Employment: Evidence from Intergenerational LinksJournal of Labor Economics, 2000
- Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of GrowthJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- A Theory of Entrepreneurship and Its Application to the Study of Business TransfersJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- Schumpeterian CompetitionThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980
- Investment in Entrepreneurial AbilityThe Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1980
- Existence of Competitive Equilibria in Markets with a Continuum of TradersEconometrica, 1966
- Innovation in the Capitalist Process: A Critique of the Schumpeterian TheoryThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1951