Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis
Open Access
- 15 April 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Urogynecology Journal
- Vol. 33 (6) , 1393-1405
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: OASI complicates approximately 6% of vaginal deliveries. This risk is increased with operative vaginal deliveries (OVDs), particularly forceps. However, there is conflicting evidence supporting the use of mediolateral/lateral episiotomy (MLE/LE) with OVD. The aim of this study was to assess whether MLE/LE affects the incidence of OASI in OVD. Methods: Electronic searches were performed in OVID Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Randomised and non-randomised observational studies investigating the risk of OASI in OVD with/without MLE/LE were eligible for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using Revman 5.3. Risk of bias of was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tool. The quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: A total of 703,977 patients from 31 studies were pooled for meta-analysis. MLE/LE significantly reduced the rate of OASI in OVD (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.42–0.84]). On sub-group analysis, MLE/LE significantly reduced the rate in nulliparous ventouse (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.42–0.84]) and forceps deliveries (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.29–0.61]). In multiparous women, although the incidence of OASI was lower when a ventouse or forceps delivery was performed with an MLE/LE, this was not statistically significant. Heterogeneity remained significant across all studies (I2 > 50). The quality of all evidence was downgraded to “very low” because of the critical risk of bias across many studies. Conclusions: MLE/LE may reduce the incidence of OASI in OVDs, particularly in nulliparous ventouse or forceps deliveries. This information will be useful in aiding clinical decision-making and counselling in the antenatal period and during labour.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviewsSystematic Reviews, 2012
- Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminologyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2012
- GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecisionJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Trends in Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in NorwayObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter ruptureActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2009
- Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?*BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2006
- Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2005
- Anal Sphincter Injury After Forceps Delivery: Myth or Reality?Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2004
- Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap techniqueBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1999
- Worldwide survey of assisted vaginal deliveryInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1994