FAME 3 fails to defame coronary artery bypass grafting: what went wrong in the percutaneous coronary intervention arm?
Authors:
- 29 January 2022
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 62 (1)
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Coronary DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Consideration of a New Definition of Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction After Coronary RevascularizationJACC, 2013
- Strategies for Multivessel Revascularization in Patients with DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies Comparing Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiographic Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Pre–Drug-Eluting Stent EraThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2011
- Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME StudyJACC, 2010
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary InterventionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgeryJACC, 2004
- Impact of intravascular ultrasound‐guided stenting on long‐term clinical outcome: A meta‐analysis of available studies comparing intravascular ultrasound‐guided and angiographically guided stentingCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2003
- Angiographic predictors of graft patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial and venous graftsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998