Risk Scores for Patients with Chest Pain: Evaluation in the Emergency Department
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 February 2011
- journal article
- Published by Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in Current Cardiology Reviews
- Vol. 7 (1) , 2-8
Abstract
Chest pain is a common reason for presentation to the emergency department (ED). Absolute criteria for Acute Coronary Syndrome without ST elevation (NSTE-ACS) are lacking. An acute coronary syndrome (ACS) needs to be distinguished from a variety of other cardiac and non-cardiac diseases that may cause chest pain. For patients with confirmed ACS, several scoring methods can be applied in order to distinguish patients in the coronary care unit who may benefit most from therapies. The PURSUIT, TIMI, GRACE and FRISC risk scores are well validated with this respect. However, none of these risk scores has been used in the identification of an ACS in the emergency setting. The vast majority of patients with chest pain due to causes other than ACS were not evaluated in these trials. An evidence- based systematic stratification and policy for these patients does not currently exist. The more recently developed HEART score is specifically designed to stratify all chest pain patients in the ED. The HEART score was validated in a retrospective multicenter study and proved to be a strong predictor of event free survival on one hand and potentially life threatening cardiac events on the other hand. The HEART score facilitates risk stratification of chest pain patients in the ED.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Patients With Stable and Unstable Coronary Heart DiseaseCirculation, 2010
- Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of CardiologyEuropean Heart Journal, 2007
- Risk scores for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: useful but simpler is not necessarily betterEuropean Heart Journal, 2007
- Risk prediction in patients presenting with suspected cardiac pain: the GRACE and TIMI risk scores versus clinical evaluationQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE)BMJ, 2006
- Uncommon anomalous papillary muscle/chordae tendineae incidentally found in patient with transient ischaemic attackHeart, 2005
- FRISC score for selection of patients for an early invasive treatment strategy in unstable coronary artery diseaseHeart, 2005
- TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE‐ACSEuropean Heart Journal, 2005
- Evaluation of the Patient with Acute Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Acute Coronary Syndromes in the GUSTO-IIb TrialCirculation, 1998