Counting spanning trees in self-similar networks by evaluating determinants
- 1 November 2011
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by AIP Publishing in Journal of Mathematical Physics
- Vol. 52 (11) , 113303
Abstract
Spanning trees are relevant to various aspects of networks. Generally, the number of spanning trees in a network can be obtained by computing a related determinant of the Laplacian matrix of the network. However, for a large generic network, evaluating the relevant determinant is computationally intractable. In this paper, we develop a fairly generic technique for computing determinants corresponding to self-similar networks, thereby providing a method to determine the numbers of spanning trees in networks exhibiting self-similarity. We describe the computation process with a family of networks, called (x, y)-flowers, which display rich behavior as observed in a large variety of real systems. The enumeration of spanning trees is based on the relationship between the determinants of submatrices of the Laplacian matrix corresponding to the (x, y)-flowers at different generations and is devoid of the direct laborious computation of determinants. Using the proposed method, we derive analytically the exact number of spanning trees in the (x, y)-flowers, on the basis of which we also obtain the entropies of the spanning trees in these networks. Moreover, to illustrate the universality of our technique, we apply it to some other self-similar networks with distinct degree distributions, and obtain explicit solutions to the numbers of spanning trees and their entropies. Finally, we compare our results for networks with the same average degree but different structural properties, such as degree distribution and fractal dimension, and uncover the effect of these topological features on the number of spanning trees.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61074119)
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the number of spanning trees on various latticesJournal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 2010
- Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networksProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Different thresholds of bond percolation in scale-free networks with identical degree sequencePhysical Review E, 2009
- Inverted Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless singularity and high-temperature algebraic order in an Ising model on a scale-free hierarchical-lattice small-world networkPhysical Review E, 2006
- Apollonian Networks: Simultaneously Scale-Free, Small World, Euclidean, Space Filling, and with Matching GraphsPhysical Review Letters, 2005
- High-precision entropy values for spanning trees in latticesJournal of Physics A: General Physics, 2003
- Scale-Free Networks Are UltrasmallPhysical Review Letters, 2003
- Statistical mechanics of complex networksReviews of Modern Physics, 2002
- Counting Minimum Weight Spanning TreesJournal of Algorithms, 1997
- Self-organized critical state of sandpile automaton modelsPhysical Review Letters, 1990