The Strategic Prevention of Gun Violence Among Gang‐Involved Offenders
Authors:
- Anthony A. BragaABAnthony A. Braga
- Glenn L. PierceGPGlenn L. Pierce
- Jack McDevittJMJack McDevitt
- Brenda J. BondBBBrenda J. Bond
- Shea CroninSCShea Cronin
- 19 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Justice Quarterly
- Vol. 25 (1) , 132-162
Abstract
Problem‐oriented policing has been suggested as a promising way to understand and prevent complex gang violence problems. A number of jurisdictions have been experimenting with new problem‐oriented frameworks to understand and respond to gun violence among gang‐involved offenders. These interventions are based on the “pulling levers” deterrence strategy that focuses criminal justice and social service attention on a small number of chronically offending gang members responsible for the bulk of urban gun violence problems. As part of the US Department of Justice‐sponsored Project Safe Neighborhoods initiative, an interagency task force implemented a pulling levers strategy to prevent gang‐related gun violence in Lowell, Massachusetts. Our impact evaluation suggests that the pulling levers strategy was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the monthly number of gun homicide and gun‐aggravated assault incidents. A comparative analysis of gun homicide and gun‐aggravated assault trends in Lowell relative to other major Massachusetts cities also supports a unique program effect associated with the pulling levers intervention.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- CriticPartnership, accountability, and innovation: clarifying Boston's experience with pulling levers2006
- Advocate Old wine in new bottles: policing and the lessons of pulling levers2006
- Understanding and Preventing Gang Violence: Problem Analysis and Response Development in Lowell, MassachusettsPolice Quarterly, 2006
- DID CEASEFIRE, COMPSTAT, AND EXILE REDUCE HOMICIDE?*Criminology & Public Policy, 2005
- KNOWING WHEN TO FOLD 'EM: AN ESSAY ON EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF CEASEFIRE, COMPSTAT, AND EXILE*Criminology & Public Policy, 2005
- Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors that Explain the Decline and Six that Do NotJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2004
- Testing for Structural Breaks in the Evaluation of ProgramsReview of Economics and Statistics, 2003
- Toward an Evidence-Based Approach to Preventing CrimeThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2001
- Youth Violence in Boston: Gun Markets, Serious Youth Offenders, and a Use-Reduction StrategyLaw and Contemporary Problems, 1996
- Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models.Psychological Bulletin, 1995