Quality indicators and development targets in the national clinical quality registries in cancer care and screening
Open Access
- 4 January 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Quality
- Vol. 14 (1) , e003019
Abstract
Background The Danish clinical quality registries monitor and improve the quality of care, using quality indicators and defined development targets referred to as ‘standards’. This study aims to investigate the fulfilment of standards in the Danish clinical quality registries in cancer care and screening. Methods Data was included from annual reports in the 27 Danish clinical quality registries in cancer care and screening. The most recent report from each registry was downloaded the 13 December 2023. Indicators were included if: evaluating care or screening over 12 months, presenting a well-defined standard with a desired direction and presenting the proportion and number of individuals for which the standard was fulfilled. Data were extracted on national and regional levels for the last 3 years, and fulfilment of standards was presented as the proportion of indicators that fulfilled the standard within each unit of comparison. Results In total, 216 quality indicators were included. At the national and regional level, standards were fulfilled for 75% and 71%, respectively. Fulfilment within the registries varied from 5% to 100% on national and 12% to 99% on regional level. Standards were more often fulfilled for result (than process indicators) and for established (than supplemental indicators). Altogether, 43% of the standards were fulfilled across all regions delivering data for the specific indicator. Conclusions The approach to defining standards for clinical quality indicators as conservative minimum or ambitious development targets varied in the Danish clinical quality registries in cancer care and screening. This deviating behaviour seriously restrains possibilities for comparing clinical quality across cancers despite the robust infrastructure of the quality registries, limiting the possibilities for overview and prioritising resources and attention to the most urgent cancers.Keywords
Funding Information
- The Danish Cancer Society (R305-A18514)
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- An overview of cancer health disparities: new approaches and insights and why they matterCarcinogenesis, 2020
- A Nationwide Study of Prevalence Rates and Characteristics of 199 Chronic Conditions in DenmarkPharmacoEconomics - Open, 2020
- Progress in cancer mortality, incidence, and survival: a global overviewEuropean Journal Of Cancer Prevention, 2020
- Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2020
- Travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities and tumour stageHealth & Place, 2019
- Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995–2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2019
- Cancer diagnostic delays and travel distance to health services: A nationwide cohort study in DenmarkCancer Epidemiology, 2019
- Quality improvement and accountability in the Danish health care systemInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2015
- National quality measurement using clinical indicators: The danish national indicator projectJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2009
- The Quality of CareJAMA, 1988