Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Burden Before and After Pulmonary Veins Isolation: An Observational Study Through a Subcutaneous Leadless Cardiac Monitor
- 23 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 24 (10) , 1075-1082
Abstract
Preablation Atrial Fibrillation Burden: Aims: Data on the success rate of ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF) are controversial. Our hypothesis is that the efficacy must be evaluated considering the AF burden (AFB) before the procedure. Moreover, the clinical significance of early recurrence (ERAT) of AF or atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) is debatable. The aim is to describe the outcome of pulmonary vein isolation in paroxysmal AF through a subcutaneous cardiac monitor (ICM) implanted before the procedure.Methods: Using CARTO 3, circumferential lesions around the pulmonary veins were placed. The study endpoint was the first documented recurrence of AF/AT by ICM after the blanking period (3 months). AFB (percentage of time in AF/AT) was collected every month before and after the procedure during the 12‐month follow‐up.Results: The ICM was implanted 94 ± 23 days before the procedure in 35 patients with paroxysmal AF (54 ± 11 years, refractory to 1.8 ± 0.6 antiarrhythmic drugs). Cumulative AFB before the procedure and after the blanking period was 2.5% (1–5%) versus 0% (0–0.25%), P < 0.001. Twenty patients (57.1%) were free of documented AF/AT recurrence, 5 patients (14.2%) reduced the AFB 90%, 6 patients (17.1%) continued the same, and 4 patients (11.4%) increased the AFB 90% for AT. The success rate with second procedure was 71.4%. All 13 patients with ERAT had recurrence after the blanking period.Conclusions: The outcome of pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal AF is well documented by an ICM. The success rate is dependent of the previous AFB that can be randomly variable and lower than expected. ERATs predict late recurrence.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does atrial fibrillation burden measured by continuous monitoring during the blanking period predict the response to ablation at 12-month follow-up?Heart Rhythm, 2012
- Arrhythmia Detection after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Value of Incremental Monitoring TimePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2011
- Performance of an implantable automatic atrial fibrillation detection device: impact of software adjustments and relevance of manual episode analysisEP Europace, 2011
- Ablation of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: 1‐Year Follow‐Up Through Continuous Subcutaneous MonitoringJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2010
- Prevalence, Predictors, and Prognosis of Atrial Fibrillation Early After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Findings from 3 Months of Continuous Automatic ECG Loop RecordingsJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2009
- Periprocedural Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation AblationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2008
- Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Catheter AblationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2006
- Usefulness of Atrial Fibrillation Burden as a Predictor for Success of Pulmonary Vein IsolationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2005
- Prevalence of Asymptomatic Recurrences of Atrial Fibrillation After Successful Radiofrequency Catheter AblationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2004
- Suppression of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias ? results of the SOPAT trialEuropean Heart Journal, 2004