RESEARCH SECTION: Multi‐agency working: what are the perspectives of SENCos and parents regarding its development and implementation?
Author:
- 18 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Special Education
- Vol. 35 (4) , 230-240
Abstract
With a national drive in England for the development and restructuring of services encouraging interdisciplinary approaches and multi‐agency working, the question remains as to how services should be developed and why it is perceived as so important. This study by Pearl Barnes, who is an Every Child Counts Teacher Leader and a member of the Specialist Advisory Board for nasen and the Child and Family Public Education Board at the Royal College of Psychiatrists, explores the perspectives of special educational needs co‐ordinators (SENCos) and parents regarding the rationale for multi‐agency working and explores what an effective service might look like. The interviews revealed overwhelming support for multi‐agency activity. Although no single rationale was identified, the general consensus was that a multi‐agency approach can provide a child‐centred pedagogical response, tailored to the individual needs of the child. Multi‐agency working was perceived as enabling and enhancing inclusive education by providing an early and holistic assessment of individual needs through identification of all individual barriers to achievement. No specific set of protocols was identified as offering the most suitable way forward within the project region. However, there was general agreement that a multi‐agency teamwork approach, accessed directly by schools and intervening proactively within the community, was an effective way forward.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards inclusion: an Australian perspectiveSupport for Learning, 2007
- Is Sure Start an Effective Preventive Intervention?Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2006
- Riding the dragon: developing inter‐agency systems for supporting childrenSupport for Learning, 2005
- Do teachers know more about specific learning difficulties than general practitioners?British Journal of Special Education, 2005
- First Thoughts on the NSF: A Personal CommentaryChild and Adolescent Mental Health, 2005
- Multi‐Agency Collaboration: The Challenges for CAMHSChild and Adolescent Mental Health, 2004
- The More Things Change the More They Stay the Same? A Response to the Audit Commission’s Report on Statutory Assessment and Statements of SENBritish Journal of Special Education, 2002
- Rhetoric or Reality?: Inter-Agency Provision for Young People with Challenging BehaviourEmotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 2001
- Sustaining the Family: Meeting the Needs of Families of Children with DisabilitiesBritish Journal of Special Education, 2000
- Multidisciplinary assessment: a case studyBritish Journal of Special Education, 1996