Clinical Utility of Plasma KRAS, NRAS and BRAF Mutational Analysis with Real Time PCR in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients—The Importance of Tissue/Plasma Discordant Cases
Authors:
- Vincenzo FormicaVFVincenzo Formica
- Jessica LucchettiJLJessica Lucchetti
- Elena DoldoEDElena Doldo
- Silvia RiondinoSRSilvia Riondino
- Cristina MorelliCMCristina Morelli
- Renato ArgiròRARenato Argirò
- Nicola RenziNRNicola Renzi
- Daniele NittiDNDaniele Nitti
- Antonella NardecchiaANAntonella Nardecchia
- Emanuela Dell’aquilaEDEmanuela Dell’aquila
- Patrizia FerroniPatrizia Ferroni
- Fiorella GuadagniFiorella Guadagni
Open Access
- 29 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 10 (1) , 87
Abstract
Background: Tumor tissue (T) mutational analysis represents the standard for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detected by liquid biopsy in plasma (PL) can better represent tumor heterogeneity. Methods: mCRC patients undergoing standard first-line chemotherapy with known T-KRAS/NRAS/BRAF status were enrolled in the present prospective study. PL mutations were assessed within 2 weeks before chemotherapy start with real time PCR and correlated with T status and Progression free survival (PFS). Clinical and biochemical variables including also total number of tumor lesions (TNL) and the sum of maximum diameter (SMD) of all lesions were assessed as potential predictors of T/PL discordance. RESULTS: Among 45 enrolled patients, all BRAF mutations were concordant between T and PL and there were 20% of patients RAS discordant: 9% wild type in T and mutated in PL and 11% mutated in T and wild type in PL. T mutations were significantly associated to median PFS (mPFS of 4.5, 8.3 and 22.9 months for T-BRAF mutated, T-RAS mutated, and T-wild type patients, respectively, p for trend 0.00014). PL mutations further refined prognosis: RAS wild type in T and mutated in PL had significantly shorter PFS than concordant RAS wild type in T and PL: mPFS 9.6 vs. 23.3 months, respectively, p = 0.02. Patients RAS mutated in T and wild type in PL had longer PFS than concordant RAS mutated in T and PL: 24.4 vs. 7.8 months, respectively, p = 0.008. At a multivariate cox regression analysis for PFS, PL mutations were independent prognostic factor superior to T analysis (HR 0.13, p = 0.0008). At multivariate logistic regression analysis TNL and SMD were significant predictors of discordant cases. Conclusions: PL mutational analysis allows a better prognostication than T analysis alone and could help in mCRC treatment management.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Application of Cell-free DNA Analysis to Cancer TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Clinical Utility of Analyzing Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal CancerThe Oncologist, 2018
- Circulating tumor DNA: a promising biomarker in the liquid biopsy of cancerOncotarget, 2016
- Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patientsNature Medicine, 2015
- The predictive value ofKRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CAand PTEN for anti-EGFR treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysisActa Oncologica, 2014
- Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancerNature, 2012
- Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion SequencingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Analysis of the Size Distributions of Fetal and Maternal Cell-Free DNA by Paired-End SequencingClinical Chemistry, 2010
- The Origin of Circulating Free DNAClinical Chemistry, 2007
- About the possible origin and mechanism of circulating DNAClinica Chimica Acta, 2001