Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a pilot pre-clinic vital signs assessment in primary care. (Preprint)
Authors:
- John BroughanJBJohn Broughan
- Seán McMahonSMSeán McMahon
- Steen GordonSGSteen Gordon
- Nandakumar RavichandranNRNandakumar Ravichandran
- Donal BaileyDBDonal Bailey
- Jennifer GrantJGJennifer Grant
- Geoff McCombeGMGeoff McCombe
- James SheilJSJames Sheil
- Walter CullenWCWalter Cullen
Preprint
- 14 February 2025
- preprint
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Preprints
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vital signs assessment can be crucial. However, such assessments are time-consuming and so are not always prioritised. Measuring vital signs before doctor visits may therefore be an effective and efficient strategy. OBJECTIVE We piloted a pre-clinic vital signs assessment (PCVSA) within a primary care centre to determine its feasibility and acceptability. METHODS A mixed methods cross-sectional design was piloted. Study participants included adult patients and practice staff. Patients had vital signs assessed by a Primary Care Assistant before GP visits. Data collected concerned participants’ study engagement, the timings of PCVSA / GP visits, and surveys / interviews investigating participants’ experiences. RESULTS Sixteen patients and four staff participated. The mean PCVSA was 2mins23secs (SD = 38.8) and the mean GP visit was 9mins 21secs (SD = 252.4). Patients said the PCVSA was a ‘Positive experience’ (87%), ‘Helpful’ (81%), ‘Valuable’ (44%), and ‘Interesting’ (38%). The GP said the PCVSA was either ‘Helpful’ (n=8, 54%) or ‘Extremely Helpful’ (n=7, 47%) in each of their consultations, and that it improved engagement with 80% of patients, allowed them to spend more time gaining understanding of the conditions of 93% of patients, and enhanced productivity in 73% of consultations. The GP strongly agreed that collecting PCVSA data before appointments would benefit patients over time. Qualitative interviews with practice staff yielded three themes: (1) Improved patient engagement and efficient consultation, (2) Time-saving potential, and (3) Practicing in general practice and associated challenges. CONCLUSIONS The PCVSA pilot showed good feasibility and acceptability as indicated by high participant engagement, short PCVSA and GP visit times (albeit GP visit times did not measure non-patient facing clinical activity), and positive feedback from patients and staff. Introducing PCVSA in healthcare settings may have potential in terms of improving the standard and efficiency of care. CLINICALTRIAL N/AKeywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hillrom Welch Allyn Power CordsBiomedical Safety & Standards, 2024
- Workload involved in vital signs-based monitoring & responding to deteriorating patients: A single site experience from a regional New Zealand hospitalHeliyon, 2022
- Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysisQualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 2018
- Make vital signs great again – A call for actionEuropean Journal of Internal Medicine, 2017
- Identification of deteriorating patients on general wards; measurement of vital parameters and potential effectiveness of the Modified Early Warning ScoreJournal of Critical Care, 2012
- How We Design Feasibility StudiesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2009
- Temperature – The forgotten vital signAccident and Emergency Nursing, 2005
- Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot studyPharmaceutical Statistics, 2005
- Can some in-hospital cardio-respiratory arrests be prevented? A prospective surveyResuscitation, 1998
- The Future1983