Factors affecting the use of cumulative sums in the analysis of circadian blood pressure
- 7 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Physiological Measurement
- Vol. 27 (6) , 529-538
Abstract
The assessment of circadian blood pressure change by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has potential as a predictor for cardiovascular events, but its evaluation is problematic due to the difficulty in defining day and night periods for individual subjects. The cumulative sums (cusums) method has the advantage of simplicity over mathematical modelling techniques and is reported to give more reproducible results than methods that use time-dependent sleep and wake periods. However, cusum parameters (cusum-derived circadian alteration magnitude (CDCAM) and cusum plot height (CPH)) are affected by the implementation of the method and by the quality of ambulatory blood pressure recordings. This study quantifies the effects of using interval blood pressure values, changing the time used for calculating the cusum plot slope (CPS) and using incomplete data recordings. Significant effects are reported in all cases. Using interval rather than recorded blood pressures causes a mean reduction in CPH and CDCAM of approximately 6%. Altering the CPS time by 1 h (from 6 h) results in a mean change in CDCAM of approximately 7%. In recordings with hourly readings, the coefficient of variation in CPH and CDCAM ranges from 4% (one missing reading) to 13% (five missing readings).Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing circadian blood pressure and heart rate changesJournal Of Hypertension, 2004
- Variability of diurnal changes in ambulatory blood pressure and nocturnal dipping status in untreated hypertensive and normotensive subjectsAmerican Journal of Hypertension, 2000
- Use and interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: recommendations of the British Hypertension SocietyBMJ, 2000
- Limited Reproducibility of Circadian Variation in Blood Pressure Dippers and NondippersAmerican Journal of Hypertension, 1998
- Reproducibility of ambulatory and clinic blood pressure measurements in elderly hypertensive subjectsJournal Of Hypertension, 1993
- Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 determined by the British Hypertension Society ProtocolJournal Of Hypertension, 1991
- The clinical significance of diurnal blood pressure variations. Dippers and nondippers.Circulation, 1990
- DIPPERS AND NON-DIPPERSThe Lancet, 1988
- Blood pressure during normal daily activities, sleep, and exercise. Comparison of values in normal and hypertensive subjectsJAMA, 1982
- CIRCADIAN VARIATION OF BLOOD-PRESSUREThe Lancet, 1978