Combining Chlorophyll Meter Measurements and Multilayer Perceptron Models to Optimize Nitrogen and Irrigation Management for Sustainable Maize Production
Open Access
- 7 May 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Agriengineering
- Vol. 8 (5) , 184
Abstract
Population growth, climate change, and increasing pressure on water and nitrogen resources pose major challenges for sustainable maize production. Maize yield is highly sensitive to inter-annual weather variability, yet many prediction approaches still rely on simple linear relationships and rarely integrate SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development)-based crop diagnostics with machine learning in multi-year nitrogen × irrigation experiments. In a three-year field experiment (2018–2020) in Hungary, we evaluated how basal and top-dressing fertilization and supplemental irrigation under contrasting water supply conditions affected the chlorophyll status and grain yield of a maize hybrid. Relative chlorophyll content was monitored using SPAD measurements at key phenological stages (V6, V12, and R1), and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model was developed to improve yield prediction and to identify informative combinations of input variables. Five alternative scenarios (SC1–SC5) were tested by combining SPAD values with the fertilization rate, irrigation status, and crop year in different configurations, and model performance was assessed using root mean square deviation (RMSD), mean absolute error (MAE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), correlation (r, r2), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE), Kendall’s tau, and the index of agreement (d). Overall, SC4 (SPAD + fertilization + crop year + irrigation) achieved the best agreement with observed yields across most indices (e.g., r ≈ 0.93, NSE ≈ 0.86, KGE ≈ 0.90), whereas SC2 (SPAD + fertilization) produced the lowest prediction error on the independent test subset, indicating the most robust generalization. Basal fertilization with 60 and 120 kg N ha−1 significantly increased yield in 2019 and 2020, while irrigation generally enhanced yield except for the 30 kg N ha−1 top dressing applied at the V6–V12 stages. These results demonstrate that coupling SPAD measurements with MLP modeling and multi-criteria performance evaluation can support more efficient, site-specific nitrogen and irrigation decisions and help stabilize maize yields under variable climatic conditions.Keywords
Funding Information
- University Research Scholarship Program of the Ministry for Culture and Innovation from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation fund (EKÖP-25-4-II)
- János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- Debreceni Egyetem
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating the impact of weather variability on maize yield fluctuation for different sowing datesAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2025
- Application of spatio-temporal data in site-specific maize yield prediction with machine learning methodsPrecision Agriculture, 2021
- Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature reviewComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020
- Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: A reviewComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018
- Deep learning in agriculture: A surveyComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018
- Irrigation and nitrogen effects on the leaf chlorophyll content and grain yield of maize in different crop yearsAgricultural Water Management, 2012
- Regional crop modelling in Europe: The impact of climatic conditions and farm characteristics on maize yieldsAgricultural Systems, 2009
- Regional assessment of climate change impacts on maize productivity and associated production risk in SwitzerlandRegional Environmental Change, 2007
- Maize productivity and mineral N dynamics following different soil fertility management practices on a depleted sandy soil in ZimbabweAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2004
- Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximatorsNeural Networks, 1989