Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions
Authors:
- Friederike E KohrsFKFriederike E Kohrs
- Susann AuerSASusann Auer
- Alexandra Bannach-BrownABAlexandra Bannach-Brown
- Susann FiedlerSFSusann Fiedler
- Tamarinde Laura HavenTHTamarinde Laura Haven
- Verena HeiseVHVerena Heise
- Constance HolmanCHConstance Holman
- Flavio AzevedoFAFlavio Azevedo
- René BernardRBRené Bernard
- Nicole BösselNBNicole Bössel
- Brian Patrick CahillBCBrian Patrick Cahill
Open Access
- 23 November 2023
- journal article
- review article
- Published by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd in eLife
- Vol. 12
Abstract
Reproducible research and open science practices have the potential to accelerate scientific progress by allowing others to reuse research outputs, and by promoting rigorous research that is more likely to yield trustworthy results. However, these practices are uncommon in many fields, so there is a clear need for training that helps and encourages researchers to integrate reproducible research and open science practices into their daily work. Here, we outline eleven strategies for making training in these practices the norm at research institutions. The strategies, which emerged from a virtual brainstorming event organized in collaboration with the German Reproducibility Network, are concentrated in three areas: (i) adapting research assessment criteria and program requirements; (ii) training; (iii) building communities. We provide a brief overview of each strategy, offer tips for implementation, and provide links to resources. We also highlight the importance of allocating resources and monitoring impact. Our goal is to encourage researchers – in their roles as scientists, supervisors, mentors, instructors, and members of curriculum, hiring or evaluation committees – to think creatively about the many ways they can promote reproducible research and open science practices in their institutions.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Wellcome Trust (SPOKES Subproject)
- Federal Ministry of Education and Research (ATLAS grant 031L0304B)
- German Research Foundation (FOR 5151 QuaLiPerF)
- SIMLIVA (465194077)
- Wellcome Trust (Translational Partnership with Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin)
- Wellcome Trust (218358)
- German Research Foundation (436883643)
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping reviewSystematic Reviews, 2017
- The religiosity as social value hypothesis: A multi-method replication and extension across 65 countries and three levels of spatial aggregation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2017
- Wer soll die Professur bekommen?Psychologische Rundschau, 2016
- The natural selection of bad scienceRoyal Society Open Science, 2016
- 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibilityNature, 2016
- Ten Simple Rules for Creating a Good Data Management PlanPLOS Computational Biology, 2015
- Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible researchThe Lancet, 2014
- Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysisThe Lancet, 2014
- Reporting Quality of Social and Psychological Intervention Trials: A Systematic Review of Reporting Guidelines and Trial PublicationsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning1992