Bone response to porous tantalum implants in a gap‐healing model
- 12 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Vol. 30 (2) , 156-168
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the relative osteogenic behavior of titanium implants with or without a porous tantalum modification when placed with a gap between the implant and existing bone.Materials and Methods: A gap‐healing model in the rabbit tibia was used for placement of titanium implants. Forty‐eight rabbits received 96 implants, with 48 of the implants containing a porous tantalum middle section and the remaining 48 implants were composed of solid titanium. After 4, 8, and 12 weeks of healing, biomechanical stability was measured with removal torque testing, implant‐adherent cells were isolated for analysis of osteogenic gene expression, and histomorphometric analysis was performed on sections of the implants and surrounding bone.Results: Increased osteogenic activity at 4 weeks was demonstrated by upregulation of key osteogenic genes at implants containing porous tantalum which was accompanied by greater bone–implant contact at 4, 8, and 12 weeks and significantly greater removal torque at 8 and 12 weeks.Conclusions: Implants containing porous tantalum demonstrated increased peri‐implant bone formation within this gap‐healing model as shown by significant differences in biomechanical and histomorphometric outcomes. Such implants may represent an alternative to influence bone healing in surgical sites with an existing gap.Keywords
Funding Information
- Zimmer Biomet (CW88368)
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Porous Tantalum Coatings Prepared by Vacuum Plasma Spraying Enhance BMSCs Osteogenic Differentiation and Bone Regeneration In Vitro and In VivoPLOS ONE, 2013
- Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 yearsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2012
- Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal ResearchPLOS Biology, 2010
- Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large‐grit and acid‐etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: an experimental study in dogsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2009
- Bone reaction to nano hydroxyapatite modified titanium implants placed in a gap‐healing modelJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2008
- Healing at fluoride‐modified implants placed in wide marginal defects: an experimental study in dogsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2007
- Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesisBiomaterials, 2005
- Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self‐contained defects. An experimental study in the dogJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2005
- Appositional bone formation in marginal defects at implantsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2003
- Implant fixation improved by close fit Cylindrical implant – bone interface studied in rabbitsActa Orthopaedica, 1988