Early Feedback on the Use of the Internal Medicine Reporting Milestones in Assessment of Resident Performance

Authors:
  • GKGregory C. Kane
    Gregory C. Kane
  • LCLisa Conforti
    Lisa Conforti
  • SHSarah Hood
    Sarah Hood
  • KCKelly J. Caverzagie
    Kelly J. Caverzagie
  • CSCynthia Smith
    Cynthia Smith
  • DCDavoren A. Chick
    Davoren A. Chick
  • EHEric S. Holmboe
    Eric S. Holmboe
  • WIWilliam F. Iobst
    William F. Iobst
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background: The educational milestones were designed as a criterion-based framework for assessing resident progression on the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies. Objective: We obtained feedback on, and assessed the construct validity and perceived feasibility and utility of, draft Internal Medicine Milestones for Patient Care and Systems-Based Practice. Methods: All participants in our mixed-methods study were members of competency committees in internal medicine residency programs. An initial survey assessed participant and program demographics; focus groups obtained feedback on the draft milestones and explored their perceived utility in resident assessment, and an exit survey elicited input on the value of the draft milestones in resident assessment. Surveys were tabulated using descriptive statistics. Conventional content analysis method was used to assess the focus group data. Results: Thirty-four participants from 17 programs completed surveys and participated in 1 of 6 focus groups. Overall, the milestones were perceived as useful in formative and summative assessment of residents. Participants raised concerns about the length and complexity of some draft milestones and suggested specific changes. The focus groups also identified a need for faculty development. In the exit survey, most participants agreed that the Patient Care and Systems-Based Practice Milestones would help competency committees assess trainee progress toward independent practice. Conclusions: Draft reporting milestones for 2 competencies demonstrated significant construct validity in both the content and response process and the perceived utility for the assessment of resident performance. To ensure success, additional feedback from the internal medicine community and faculty development will be necessary.

This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit: