Biogeomorphology: understanding different research approaches
- 26 October 2010
- journal article
- esex commentary
- Published by Wiley in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Vol. 36 (1) , 136-138
Abstract
Geomorphologists and ecologists commonly employ different scientific approaches to data collection and validation. Ecologists often employ a more statistics‐based approach, whereas geomorphologists place less emphasis on replication and significance testing and more often focus on multiple‐parameter measurements and theoretical reasoning. These differences in approach could slow down collaboration between the fields and hinder integration in biogeomorphology. Such integrated research is necessary, however, if both fields are to benefit from the knowledge and experience of the other. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamic interactions of life and its landscape: feedbacks at the interface of geomorphology and ecologyEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2010
- Statistical significance and biological relevance: A call for a more cautious interpretation of results in ecologyActa Oecologica, 2008
- On the interface between ecology and geomorphologyNorsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 2008
- Recurrent soil freeze–thaw cycles enhance grassland productivityNew Phytologist, 2007
- Kinds and problems of geomorphological explanationGeomorphology, 2007
- Assessing agreement of measurements and predictions in geomorphologyGeomorphology, 2006
- Non‐significant results in ecology: a burden or a blessing in disguise?Oikos, 2003
- Statistics as viewed by biologistsJournal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2002
- Biogeomorphology revisited: looking towards the futureGeomorphology, 2002
- Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an AlternativeThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2000