Periosteal-Preserving Fibula Onlay Graft With Fibula Free Flap for Vertical Augmentation in Mandibular Reconstruction
- 25 August 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Plastic Surgery
- Vol. 97 (6) , 658-665
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of double-strut fibula onlay bone graft combined with a vascularized fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction, focusing on long-term graft volume changes and viability. Materials and Methods: This retrospective review included 9 patients (7 males, 2 females) who underwent simultaneous reconstruction with a fibula free flap and fibula onlay bone graft between 2017 and 2023. The mean follow-up period was 2.19±1.69 years. Clinical and radiologic data were collected to assess bone volume, speech, dietary function, and postoperative complications. Volumetric analysis was conducted using 3D imaging, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare bone volume changes between the graft and flap groups. Results: The mean fibula onlay graft length was 5.9±1.7 cm (range: 2.8 to 7.6 cm). Postoperative imaging showed higher bone volumes in the fibula flap group at all time points. The onlay graft group exhibited a higher median percentage bone volume reduction (43.48%) compared with the fibula flap group (22.37%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P =0.136), and the series was too small to exclude a clinically meaningful difference. Bone union was achieved in 88.9% of cases, with 1 graft failure (11.1%) and 1 wound infection (11.1%). Conclusion: In this small, uncontrolled series, the combination of a periosteal-preserving fibula onlay bone graft with a vascularized fibula free flap was feasible and achieved vertical augmentation with acceptable graft viability and a low complication rate. Larger controlled studies are required before the technique can be recommended over established alternatives.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association between non-vascularised bone graft failure and compartment of the defect in mandibular reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysisBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022
- Double‐Barrel Versus Single‐Barrel Fibula Flaps for Mandibular Reconstruction: Safety and OutcomesThe Laryngoscope, 2021
- Vascularized fibular grafts for the treatment of long bone defects: pros and cons. A systematic review and meta-analysisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021
- Non-vascularised fibular bone graft after vascular crisis: compensation for the failure of vascularised fibular free flapsBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2018
- Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: Molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approachesJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2012
- Reconstruction of the Mandible and the MaxillaArchives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 2010
- Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: An outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant successHead & Neck, 1999
- Mandibular reconstruction using the double barrel fibular graftMicrosurgery, 1995
- The effects of soft tissue coverage on bone graft resorption in the craniofacial regionBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1992
- Oromandibular Reconstruction Using Microvascular Composite Free Flaps: Report of 71 Cases and a New Classification Scheme for Bony, Soft-Tissue, and Neurologic DefectsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1991