Whose urban development? Changing credibilities, forms and functions of urbanization in Chengdu, China
- 1 December 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Land Use Policy
- Vol. 79, 942-951
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Samfund og Erhverv, Det Frie Forskningsråd
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Filling the Institutional Void in Rural Land Markets in Southern China: Is there Room for Spontaneous Change from Below?Development and Change, 2015
- The ‘credibility thesis’ and its application to property rights: (In)Secure land tenure, conflict and social welfare in ChinaLand Use Policy, 2014
- State-Led Urbanization in China: Skyscrapers, Land Revenue and “Concentrated Villages”The China Quarterly, 2014
- China must protect high-quality arable landNature, 2014
- China's Landed Urbanization: Neoliberalizing Politics, Land Commodification, and Municipal Finance in the Growth of MetropolisesEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2014
- In defense of endogenous, spontaneously ordered development: institutional functionalism and Chinese property rightsThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 2013
- Rule through Difference on China's Urban–Rural BoundaryThird World Quarterly, 2012
- “Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy ProcessThe China Quarterly, 2009
- Policy Experimentation in China’s Economic RiseStudies in Comparative International Development, 2007
- Off balance: The unintended consequences of fiscal federalism in ChinaJournal of Chinese Political Science, 2004