Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor
Authors:
- Kay I. DanielsKDKay I. Daniels
- Laura BrodzinskyLBLaura Brodzinsky
- Yasser Y. El-SayedYEYasser Y. El-Sayed
- Aaron B. CaugheyACAaron B. Caughey
- Deirdre J. LyellDLDeirdre J. Lyell
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 197 (3) , 306.e1-306.e5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Maternal and Infant Outcomes From Primary Cesarean Delivery During the Second Compared With First Stage of LaborObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Risk factors for cervical insufficiency after term deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006
- Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2005
- How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of laborObstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Factors associated with a prolonged second state of labour--a case-controlled study of 364 nulliparous laboursJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003
- The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcomeActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2002
- Neonatal and maternal morbidity in relation to the length of the second stage of labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1992
- The characteristics of the second stage of labour in 25 069 singleton deliveries in the North West Thames Health Region, 1988BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1992
- Primigravid LaborObstetrics & Gynecology, 1955