On the Relationship Between the Signature of Close Electric Field and the Equivalent Corona Current in Lightning Return Stroke Models
Authors:
- Vernon CoorayVCVernon Cooray
- Vladimir A. RakovVRVladimir A. Rakov
- Farhad RachidiFRFarhad Rachidi
- Raul MontañoRMRaul Montaño
- Carlo Alberto NucciCNCarlo Alberto Nucci
- 26 August 2008
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility
- Vol. 50 (4) , 921-927
Abstract
Engineering return stroke models can be categorized either as current generation (traveling current source type) models or current propagation (transmission line type) models. The current generation models are described among other parameters by a corona current distributed along the channel. Recent studies show that there is equivalence between the models of current generation and current propagation types. Due to this equivalence, any engineering return stroke model of current propagation type can be described in terms of an equivalent corona current per unit channel length. The measurements conducted within 10-500 m from triggered lightning flashes show that the electric field of subsequent return strokes at these distances flattens within 15 mus or so. In this paper, the constraints imposed by this feature on the temporal and spatial variation of the equivalent corona current are investigated. The results show that in order for the close fields to flatten within 15 mus or so, the equivalent corona current, should be bipolar and the corona current wave shape at late times should be identical to that of the longitudinal current time derivative. This is in contrast to most of the engineering models of current generation type, in which the corona current is assumed to be unipolar.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of channel-base currents and optical signals for rocket-triggered lightning strokesAtmospheric Research, 2005
- On the concepts used in return stroke models applied in engineering practiceIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2003
- The Lightning Flash2003
- Predicting the spatial and temporal variation of the electromagnetic fields, currents, and speeds of subsequent return strokesIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1998
- Luminosity characteristics of dart leaders and return strokes in natural lightningJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997
- Lightning return stroke model with height‐variable discharge time constantJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1994
- Lightning return stroke current models with specified channel‐base current: A review and comparisonJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1990
- On the Master, Uman, Lin, Standler and the Modified Transmission Line Lightning return stroke current modelsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1990
- Variation in light intensity with height and time from subsequent lightning return strokesJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1983
- Magnetic field of lightning return strokeJournal of Geophysical Research, 1969