Genetic screening of 15 hearing loss variants in 77,647 neonates with clinical follow‐up
Open Access
- 1 December 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
- Vol. 12 (1) , e2324
Abstract
Background: To analyze the genotype distribution and frequency of hearing loss genes in newborn population and evaluate the clinical value of genetic screening policy in China.Methods: Genetic screening for hearing loss was offered to 84,029 neonates between March 2019 and December 2021, of whom 77,647 newborns accepted the screening program with one‐year follow‐up. The genotyping of 15 hot spot variants in GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4, and MT‐RNR1 was performed on microarray platform.Results: A total of 3.05% (2369/77,647) newborns carried at least one genetic hearing loss‐associated variant, indicated for early preventive management. The carrier frequency of GJB2 gene was the highest, at 1.48% (1147/77,647), followed by SLC26A4 gene at 1.07% (831/77,647), and GJB3 gene at 0.23% (181/77,647). GJB2 c.235delC variant and SLC26A4 IVS7‐2A>G variant were the most common allelic variants with allele frequency of 0.6304% (979/155,294) and 0.3992% (620/155,294), respectively. 10 children are identified as homozygous or compound heterozygous for pathogenic variants (4 in GJB2, 6 in SLC26A4), and 7 of these infants had passed the hearing screening. Following up of the genetically screened newborns revealed that genetic screening detected more hearing‐impaired infants than hearing screening alone. Genetic screening helped identify the infants who had passed the initial hearing screening, and reduced time for diagnosis and intervention of hearing aid. In addition, we identified 234 newborns (0.30%, 234/77,647) susceptible to preventable aminoglycoside antibiotic ototoxicity undetectable by hearing screening.Conclusion: We performed the largest‐scale neonatal carrier screening for hearing loss genes in Southeast China. Our results indicated that genetic screening is an important complementation to conventional hearing screening. Our practice and experience may facilitate the application and development of neonatal genetic screening policy in mainland China.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Children with GJB2 and SLC26A4 MutationsPLOS ONE, 2015
- The effect of GJB2 and SLC26A4 gene mutations on rehabilitative outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant patientsEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2013
- The future role of genetic screening to detect newborns at risk of childhood-onset hearing lossInternational Journal of Audiology, 2012
- Limitations of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in Early Identification of Pediatric Cochlear Implant CandidatesJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 2011
- Newborn Hearing Screening — A Silent RevolutionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practiceArchives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 2004
- Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment studyCommentary: Universal newborn hearing screening: implications for coordinating and developing services for deaf and hearing impaired childrenBMJ, 2001
- Candidate Locus for a Nuclear Modifier Gene for Maternally Inherited DeafnessThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 2000
- Connexin-26 mutations in sporadic and inherited sensorineural deafnessThe Lancet, 1998
- Pendred syndrome is caused by mutations in a putative sulphate transporter gene (PDS)Nature Genetics, 1997