On the proof complexity of deep inference
Open Access
- 1 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
- Vol. 10 (2) , 1-34
Abstract
We obtain two results about the proof complexity of deep inference: (1) Deep-inference proof systems are as powerful as Frege ones, even when both are extended with the Tseitin extension rule or with the substitution rule; (2) there are analytic deep-inference proof systems that exhibit an exponential speedup over analytic Gentzen proof systems that they polynomially simulate.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E042805/1)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Locality for Classical LogicNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 2006
- Cut Elimination inside a Deep Inference System for Classical Predicate LogicStudia Logica, 2006
- Structures for Multiplicative Cyclic Linear Logic: Deepness vs Cyclicity2004
- Two Restrictions on ContractionLogic Journal of the IGPL, 2003
- Atomic Cut Elimination for Classical LogicLecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003
- Boolean Functions and Computation Models2002
- Polynomial size proofs of the propositional pigeonhole principleThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1987
- Linear logicTheoretical Computer Science, 1987
- The relative efficiency of propositional proof systemsThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1979
- On the lengths of proofs in the propositional calculus (Preliminary Version)1974