The soft underbelly of complexity science adoption in policymaking: towards addressing frequently overlooked non-technical challenges
Open Access
- 29 April 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Policy Sciences
- Vol. 57 (2) , 403-436
Abstract
The deepening integration of social-technical systems creates immensely complex environments, creating increasingly uncertain and unpredictable circumstances. Given this context, policymakers have been encouraged to draw on complexity science-informed approaches in policymaking to help grapple with and manage the mounting complexity of the world. For nearly eighty years, complexity-informed approaches have been promising to change how our complex systems are understood and managed, ultimately assisting in better policymaking. Despite the potential of complexity science, in practice, its use often remains limited to a few specialised domains and has not become part and parcel of the mainstream policy debate. To understand why this might be the case, we question why complexity science remains nascent and not integrated into the core of policymaking. Specifically, we ask what the non-technical challenges and barriers are preventing the adoption of complexity science into policymaking. To address this question, we conducted an extensive literature review. We collected the scattered fragments of text that discussed the non-technical challenges related to the use of complexity science in policymaking and stitched these fragments into a structured framework by synthesising our findings. Our framework consists of three thematic groupings of the non-technical challenges: (a) management, cost, and adoption challenges; (b) limited trust, communication, and acceptance; and (c) ethical barriers. For each broad challenge identified, we propose a mitigation strategy to facilitate the adoption of complexity science into policymaking. We conclude with a call for action to integrate complexity science into policymaking further.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministry of Education - Singapore (A-0004551-00-00)
This publication has 144 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal surveillance against bioinvasions: a sample average approximation method applied to an agent‐based spread modelEcological Applications, 2021
- Agent‐based models with qualitative data are thought experiments, not policy engines: A commentary on Lustick and Tetlock 2021FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE, 2021
- Critical realism and complexity theory: Building a nonconstructivist systems research framework for effective governance analysisSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 2019
- Thinking (in) complexity: (In) definitions and (mis)conceptionsSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 2019
- Systems and Complexity Theories of Organizations2016
- Ethical and Legal Issues in Decision Support2016
- Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design2015
- Mind, the gap in landscape‐evolution modellingEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2010
- Systems thinking and thinking systemsSystem Dynamics Review, 1994
- Systems thinking/system dynamics: Let's just get on with itSystem Dynamics Review, 1994