Global cervical cancer research: A scientometric density equalizing mapping and socioeconomic analysis
Open Access
- 6 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 17 (1) , e0261503
Abstract
Cervical cancer has caused substantial morbidity and mortality for millions of women over the past decades. While enormous progress has been made in diagnosis, prevention and therapy, the disease is still fatal for many women—especially in low-income countries. Since no detailed studies are available on the worldwide research landscape, we here investigated the global scientific output related to this cancer type by an established protocol. The “New Quality and Quantity Indices in Science” platform assessed all relevant cervical cancer research published in the Web of Science since 1900. A detailed analysis was conducted including country-specific research productivity, indicators for scientific quality, and relation of research activity to socioeconomic and epidemiologic figures. Visualization of data was generated by the use of density equalizing map projections. Our approach identified 22,185 articles specifically related to cervical cancer. From a global viewpoint, the United States of America was the dominating country in absolute numbers, being followed by China and Japan. By contrast, the European countries Sweden, Austria, and Norway were positioned first when the research activity was related to the population number. When the scientific productivity was related to annual cervical cancer cases, Scandinavian countries (Finland #1, Sweden #4, Norway #5, Denmark #7), the Alpine countries Austria (#2) and Switzerland (#6), and the Netherlands (#3) were leading the field. Density equalizing mapping visualized that large parts of Africa and South America were almost invisible regarding the global participation in cervical cancer research. Our data documented that worldwide cervical cancer research activity is continuously increasing but is imbalanced from a global viewpoint. Also, the study indicated that global and public health aspects should be strengthened in cervical carcinoma research in order to empower more countries to take part in international research activities.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ten-year publication trends in dermatology in mainland ChinaInternational Journal of Dermatology, 2013
- Global Burden of Human Papillomavirus and Related DiseasesVaccine, 2012
- A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research fundingBMC Public Health, 2012
- Breast cancer research output, 1945-2008: a bibliometric and density-equalizing analysisBreast Cancer Research, 2010
- Quality and quantity indices in science: use of visualization toolsEMBO Reports, 2009
- New quality and quantity indices in science (NewQIS): the study protocol of an international projectJournal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 2009
- Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknessesThe FASEB Journal, 2007
- Decline in Cervical Cancer Incidence and Mortality in New South Wales in Relation to Control Activities (Australia)Cancer Causes & Control, 2006
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005
- Change in American Cancer Society Checkup Guidelines for Detection of Cervical CancerCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1988