Pupillary response predicts multiple object tracking load, error rate, and conscientiousness, but not inattentional blindness
Authors:
- Timothy J. WrightTWTimothy J. Wright
- Walter R. BootWBWalter R. Boot
- Chelsea S. MorganCMChelsea S. Morgan
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Acta Psychologica
- Vol. 144 (1) , 6-11
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Psi Chi
- American Psychological Association of Graduate Students (APAGS)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Working memory and inattentional blindnessPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2012
- Minds on the blink: The relationship between inattentional blindness and attentional blinkAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2011
- Is Inattentional Blindness Related to Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity or Executive Control Functioning?Perception, 2010
- The attentional cost of inattentional blindnessCognition, 2008
- The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindnessCognition, 2007
- Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindnessPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007
- Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitationsPsychophysiology, 1996
- Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- Pupillary Responses During Information Processing Vary with Scholastic Aptitude Test ScoresScience, 1979
- Pupillometric Signs of Brain Activation Vary with Level of Cognitive ProcessingScience, 1978