Hydrophone placement yields high variability in detection of Epinephelus striatus calls at a spawning site
Open Access
- 1 July 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Applications
- Vol. 35 (5) , e70081
Abstract
Passive acoustic monitoring is a cost‐effective, minimally invasive technology commonly used to study behavior and population dynamics of soniferous fish species. To understand the strengths and limitations of acoustic monitoring for this purpose at fish spawning aggregations (FSA) requires an assessment of the variability in aggregation‐associated sounds (AAS) as a function of time, space, and proximity for spawning fishes of interest. Here, we evaluate temporal and spatial trends in the detection of AAS by Nassau Grouper ( Epinephelus striatus ) using an array of six hydrophones deployed across a large Nassau Grouper FSA at Little Cayman, Cayman Islands. We collected continuous data for nine days during a winter spawning season and subsequently used an automatic classifier to extract the embedded Nassau Grouper AAS. Using these data, we analyzed variability in spatiotemporal AAS detection rates across the array with a Bayesian mixed effects model. We found high variability in the detection of AAS across the spawning site, with positive correlations among neighboring hydrophone pairs trending toward negative correlations with distances exceeding 350 m. Indeed, temporal trends in AAS rates at the spawning site were approximately inverted at the two most distant hydrophones (~600 m). Across the hydrophone network, our model predicted strong positive effects of fish proximity, spawning behavior, and crepuscular periods on detected AAS. Our findings suggest hydrophone placement can strongly influence AAS detection rates and even basic temporal patterns in AAS across the spawning season. Given both the vagaries of movement and behavior of aggregating fish at spawning sites and the limits of AAS detection using standard monitoring tools, we suggest spawning site acoustic monitoring programs deploy hydrophone arrays of sufficient size to capture the site‐wide trends in AAS rates if possible; this is particularly true if researchers hope to compare/contrast AAS rates between spawning sites or across seasons for the purpose of population assessment.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automatic acoustic identification of individuals in multiple species: improving identification across recording conditionsJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2019
- Automatic detection, classification, and quantification of sciaenid fish calls in an estuarine soundscape in the Southeast United StatesPLOS ONE, 2019
- Automatic classification of grouper species by their sounds using deep neural networksThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018
- Reef fish communities are spooked by scuba surveys and may take hours to recoverPeerJ, 2018
- Estimating fish abundance at spawning aggregations from courtship sound levelsScientific Reports, 2017
- Estimating animal population density using passive acousticsBiological Reviews, 2012
- The future of fishTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2012
- The utility of a long‐term acoustic recording system for detecting white seabass Atractoscion nobilis spawning soundsJournal of Fish Biology, 2012
- Interrater reliability: the kappa statisticBiochemia Medica, 2012
- A Global Baseline for Spawning Aggregations of Reef FishesConservation Biology, 2008