Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study
Open Access
- 1 September 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Local and Regional Anesthesia
- Vol. ume 16, 153-163
Abstract
Purpose: Procedure discomfort can limit electrodiagnostic studies. Reducing discomfort can maximize the benefits of these diagnostic tools. This study targeted the discomfort associated with nerve conduction studies (NCS). Patients and Methods: This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing the effect of topical lidocaine gel (2%) versus analgesic-free lubricant gel (K-Y gel) on pain perception during NCS. Sequential patients (n=130) referred for routine NCS participated in the study. We applied 1 mL of lidocaine gel to one palm, and 1 mL of K-Y gel to the other as a control. After 20– 45 min of application, graded increments of electrical stimulation intensity were delivered to record the median and ulnar mixed palmar nerve responses. Patients were then asked to score the degree of pain felt from electrical stimulation over each palm using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale (WBFPS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), independent of baseline pain. Results: Mean WBFPS and NRS scores for lidocaine-treated palms were significantly lower than those for controls using parametric paired t-test (3.79 vs 4.37 and 3.35 vs 3.78 respectively, all p-values< 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in mean scores in females, patients aged ≤ 50 years, patients without a history of previous NCS, and patients without comorbidities (all p-values< 0.05). Median scores using nonparametric Wilcoxon ranked test also showed statistically significant differences (all p-values< 0.05). Conclusion: The results indicate that topical lidocaine 2% gel reduces discomfort associated with NCS. However, despite the statistical significance, clear clinical significance may be lacking. Clinical implementation may be considered for the subgroups that showed the greatest benefit. Further studies that incorporate more efficient drug delivery methods may yield better results.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-StatisticiansInternational Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2012
- Topical Anesthetics for Dermatologic Procedures: A ReviewDermatologic Surgery, 2012
- Analysis of Statistical Methods and Errors in the Articles Published in the Korean Journal of PainThe Korean Journal of Pain, 2010
- Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statisticsAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2010
- Prospective double‐blind crossover trial of ibuprofen in reducing EMG painMuscle & Nerve, 2008
- Systemic Absorption of Topical Lidocaine in Normal Volunteers, Patients with Post-Herpetic Neuralgia, and Patients with Acute Herpes ZosterJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2002
- Electromyography: do the diagnostic ends justify the means?Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1995
- Analysis of Statistical Tests to Compare Visual Analog Scale Measurements among GroupsAnesthesiology, 1995
- Pedictors of patients' expreience of pain in EMGMuscle & Nerve, 1987
- The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental painPain, 1983